-

- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8229
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
29 Jun 2023, 6:48 am
Change from 8 P slots to:
2 SP + 2 RP + 4 P
4 SP + 2 RP + 2 p
or any other combination...
-

- freeman3
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm
13 Jan 2024, 11:41 pm
I just feel like this is constraining strategy. Let people put as many or as few relievers or starters as they want!
-
- jaredprebish
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 5:04 pm
14 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
Agreed. I’d rather see the switch away from wins than this. I feel pitching nowadays has transitioned in such a way that there’s a greater blur between actual starters, game openers, middle/closing relievers. I want flexibility in how I chose to set my staff up,
-

- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8229
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
14 Jan 2024, 10:07 am
@Freeman: There has to be constraints to reflect actual baseball. We don't have any defensive stats yet we constrain you to x number of defensive positions (C,1B,2B, etc...).
@ Jared: This is a better argument against the slot constraints but in turn, it becomes an argument for the QA4 stat (or some such variation).
-

- freeman3
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm
14 Jan 2024, 10:42 am
Seems like the main impact would be somewhat capping the number of relievers to 6. Which isn't that much of a constraint--I don't think that's happened too much that someone has wanted to roll out more than 6 relievers. But is this the realistic constraint we're trying to put in--not having someone rolling out 7 or 8 relievers on a daily basis? I'll think about that one some more.
Actually, the capping it at 4 might be more interesting. Right now, the value of relievers is low once we added holds. But you cap it at 4 and high saves/hold guys might get more valuable because you can't make up for a weaker staff by adding more guys. This is actually more interesting than I initially thought.