Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3741
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 17 Oct 2014, 11:56 pm

Informed and sophisticated critique, I think. http://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-cont ... evitin.pdf
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 20 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm

freeman3 wrote:Informed and sophisticated critique, I think. http://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-cont ... evitin.pdf
looong...

I am working through it. So far, my highlight:

Ben Bernanke wrote: Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve. I would like to say to Milton [Friedman] and Anna [Schwarz]: Regarding the Great Depression. You’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.


In 2002.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 21 Oct 2014, 6:50 am

The conclusion is succinct. The only way for a more permanent solution on the proper regulatory environment is to somehow change the way politics influences regulation.
I wonder if that is possible?
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 1111
Joined: 26 Mar 2011, 8:04 pm

Post 21 Oct 2014, 1:14 pm

Without getting full circle back to the thread I started on democracy, I do not think we can actually fundamentally alter the nature of politics. In theory (and sometimes in practice) the politicians in a democracy end up giving the People what they want and that does not necessarily equate with what they need. And then (yes, yes, yes...) there are other factors.

Although I think that in the [somewhat distant] past Congress had actually done a decent job of passing regulation, although not with a degree of prophecy necessary to stave off actual disaster. It was not until the debacle known as the Great Depression (and the 1929 to 1933 Bear Market...more like massive angry polar bear market...) that Congress got its shit wired and passed the Securities Act of 1932 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, creating the SEC. The Investment Company Act of 1940, however, was indeed pretty prophetic. There were less than 50 mutual funds (I don't recall the exact number) in the whole United States' securities markets at the time. There are now 10,000, all governed by the 1940 Act. So one out of three ain't bad, I guess...

OK what's my point? Members of Congress have, in the past, thought rather ahead (though not in time to prevent the massive financial @#$! that was the Great Depression and its associated bear market and bank failures). But when they haven't, well, that is rather human nature, isn't it? Human beings tend not to fix things, no matter how many Cassandras are shouting at them to do something, until they are standing on the edge of a precipice, ready to fall into the chasm.