bbauska wrote:I am sorry you were unable to follow that.

She believes in feminism but does not call for any government intervention (which has worked in other countries) to bring it about

danivon wrote:

bbauska wrote:I am sorry you were unable to follow that.

I was able, I got both possible meanings but for giggles decided to pick the one that you probably did not intend.

But I did as a wink-smiley as a flag. I am sorry you were unable to get the joke

rickyp wrote:freeman3.

She believes in feminism but does not call for any government intervention (which has worked in other countries) to bring it about

Carly is the Republican example of The Woman who made it" , so the system must be fair... (Carson is their token black success story).

Republicans have the same problem on income inequality. They now all recognize it publicly, even Perry recently made a speech about it. But they propose the same policies that have exacerbated income inequality over the last 35 years.

Carly is unlikely to qualify for the Fox debates as one of the top ten candidates. her polling numbers are non-existent. Any candidate not included in the first debates because of low polling will be immediately written off.

She's polling better than the governor of Ohio, a senator from South Carolina, and a governor of Louisiana. So, I don't know about "non-existent.

rickyp wrote:fate

She's polling better than the governor of Ohio, a senator from South Carolina, and a governor of Louisiana. So, I don't know about "non-existent.

The margin of error is more than her poll numbers...
Plus, if the Fox rules stand, she needs to finish in the top ten to participate in the debates.
Your right in that she would be in the party of the gentlemen you name as excluded .

The MOE covers quite a few candidates

But as members of the Obama administration can attest, Clinton was one of the leading drivers of the TPP when Secretary of State. Here are 45 instances when she approvingly invoked the trade bill about which she is now expressing concerns:

1. January 31, 2013: Remarks on American Leadership at the Council on Foreign Relations

"First and foremost, this so-called pivot has been about creative diplomacy:Like signing a little-noted treaty of amity and cooperation with ASEAN that opened the door to permanent representation and ultimately elevated a forum for engaging on high-stakes issues like the South China Sea. We've encouraged India's "Look East" policy as a way to weave another big democracy into the fabric of the Asia Pacific. We've used trade negotiations over the Trans-Pacific Partnership to find common ground with a former adversary in Vietnam. And the list goes on."

2. January 18, 2013: Remarks With Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida

"We also discussed the Trans-Pacific Partnership and we shared perspectives on Japan's possible participation, because we think this holds out great economic opportunities to all participating nations."

. . .

WASHINGTON — Emails that a longtime confidant to Hillary Rodham Clinton recently handed over to the House committee investigating the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, raise new questions about whether the State Department and Mrs. Clinton have complied with a series of requests from the panel.

The emails, provided by Sidney Blumenthal, a close adviser to Mrs. Clinton, include information about weapons that were circulating in Libya and about the security situation in Benghazi in the year and a half before the attacks. The committee has asked the State Department and Mrs. Clinton several times in the past year for emails from her and other department officials about “weapons located or found in” Libya and about the decision to open and maintain a diplomatic mission in Benghazi.

The emails from Mr. Blumenthal have widened a rift between the State Department and the committee. State Department officials said that they had complied only with requests and subpoenas related directly to the attacks because the committee’s demands were too broad. The department has “provided the committee with a subset of documents that matched its request and will continue to work with them going forward,” said a spokesman, Alec Gerlach.

But the panel has called that an excuse to protect Mrs. Clinton and to slow the investigation of the attacks, which occurred on Sept. 11, 2012, and resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.

It is not clear whether the State Department possesses the emails between Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Blumenthal and did not hand them over. It is also possible that Mrs. Clinton never provided them to the department and deleted them off the server that housed the personal account she used exclusively when she was secretary of state.

rickyp wrote:http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/310116/sidney-blumenthal-testifies-about-hillary-and-benghazi/

Blumenthal is testifying at the House today.
So i suppose the house of cards will all come tumbling down.
or not.

He is a practiced liar, which is why the Clintons hired him at CGI. He's useful to them

rickyp wrote:fate

He is a practiced liar, which is why the Clintons hired him at CGI. He's useful to them

You don't sound in the least hopeful that the innuendo will be turned into solid evidence of wrong doing....
Are you learning from experience?

rickyp wrote:The result of the Blumenthal testimony.

http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/art ... hazi-panel

Underwhelming as always.;