Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 07 Jan 2013, 3:49 pm

rickyp wrote:fate
Tom specifically cited "elementary schools." Your list is all over the map
.

Well, mass shootings are all over the map.
Or do they only become horrible events if they take place in elementary schools?


Thank you for bring such clarity to my sense that Redscape political discussions are a black hole.

The issue is gun control. Your post of a listing of school shootings going back many decades, before sem--automatic weapons were in wide distribution as a matter of fact, was a tour de force in absolute meaninglessness.

Is it new information that will affirm the need for banning semi-autos? No, not when it contains shootings done with revolvers, shootings done out of jealousy (non-mass shootings, also known as "murder"), and a variety of unrelated shootings. In other words, it was no argument at all.

Then you respond with something completely insipid. Okay. Whatever.

What GMTom actually said:

I don't think you will find many people suggest every single school (elementary especially) should have armed guards. This was a crazy insane situation that just doesn't happen. To even try and foresee such a crazy situation and try limit it is going overboard. This was a situation where a mentally ill person was determined to cause mass killings. The law worked, he was prohibited from owning a gun, he stole guns, he was locked out of the school, he broke in. He was going to pull this off and to try to now cover this bizarre situation like it's in any sort of way common is simply foolish. And what happens when some lunatic decides to blow up a preschool with a bomb? It sucks but Sh1t happens and this is one of those really sad times... not trying to diminish it, it's sad and terrible but so has been so many other crazy things.


danivon wrote:Actually, his post talked about 'every single school', and included elementary schools. It was not specific to them alone. He also mentioned pre-schools.


Yes, you're right. But again, that is tangential. He said it was "a crazy insane situation that just doesn't happen. To even try and foresee such a crazy situation and try limit it is going overboard."

That's the thrust of his argument.

Or even reading it and the previous ones properly?


Maybe. I'm so sorry I didn't read rickyp's non-argument more carefully. After all, it was made with such non-force and inelegance that I should have plumbed its shallows more carefully.

From rickyp's list of shootings, I'm only drawing from post 1991 to show the non-insights:

January 8, 1991, Richardson, Texas Jeremy Wade Delle, 15, killed himself with a .357 Magnum in front of his second-period English class. The incident inspired the Pearl Jam song "Jeremy".


That counts as a "school shooting."

Now, it's sad, but is it quite like the Sandy Hook shooting?

Was a semi-automatic employed?

Does this have anything to do with Sandy Hook? Is there any proposal on the books that would stop this?

Meanwhile, all of these occurred during the Assault Weapons Ban:

November 7, 1994: Wickliffe, Ohio (Wickliffe Middle School shooting) Keith Ledeger, 37, a former student at the school, shot and killed custodian Pete Christopher and wounded four other adults.
January 12, 1995: Seattle Washington A 15-year-old Garfield High School student left school during the day and returned with his grandfather's 9mm semiautomatic handgun. He wounded two students.[58]
October 12, 1995: Blackville, South Carolina (Blackville-Hilda High School shooting) Anthony Sincino, 16, killed one teacher and wounded another before committing suicide.
November 15, 1995: Lynnville, Tennessee (Richland High School shooting) James Rouse, 17, killed a student and teacher and seriously wounded another teacher with a .22-caliber rifle.
February 2, 1996: Moses Lake, Washington (Frontier Middle School shooting) Barry Loukaitis, 14, killed a teacher and two students and wounded another student when he opened fire on his algebra class.
August 15, 1996: San Diego, California (San Diego State University shooting) Frederick Martin Davidson, a 36-year-old graduate student killed three professors that he believed were involved in a conspiracy against him.
September 17, 1996: State College, Pennsylvania (Hetzel Union Building shooting) Jillian Robbins, 19, shot and killed one student and injured two outside Pennsylvania State University’s Hetzel Union Building.
February 19, 1997: Bethel, Alaska Bethel Regional High School student Evan Ramsey, 16, shot and killed the school’s principal and one student, and wounded two other students..
October 1, 1997: Pearl, Mississippi (Pearl High School shooting) Luke Woodham, 16, murdered his mother at home before killing his ex-girlfriend and another student and wounding seven others at Pearl High School. He and his friends were said to be outcasts who worshiped Satan.
November 27, 1997: West Palm Beach, Florida Conniston Middle School student Tronneal Magnum, 14, fatally shot Johnpierre Kamel, 14, outside school after an argument over a @#$!.[59]
December 1, 1997: West Paducah, Kentucky (Heath High School shooting) Three students were killed and five wounded by Michael Carneal, 14, as they participated in a prayer circle.
December 15, 1997: Stamps, Arkansas Joseph “Colt” Todd, 14, concealed in a wooded area on school grounds, shot and wounded two students as they were entering Stamps High School.[60]
March 24, 1998: Craighead County, Arkansas Mitchell Johnson, 13, and Andrew Golden, 11, killed four students and one teacher and wounded ten others as Westside Middle School emptied during a fire alarm intentionally set off by Golden.
April 24, 1998: Edinboro, Pennsylvania (Parker Middle School dance shooting) Andrew Wurst, 14, fatally shot teacher John Gillette, 48, and wounded two students and a teacher at an 8th grade graduation dance.
May 19, 1998: Fayetteville, Tennessee Jacob Davis, 18, shot Robert Creson, 18, in a dispute over a girl.[61]
May 21, 1998: Springfield, Oregon After killing his parents at home, Kip Kinkel,15, drove to Thurston High School where he shot and killed two students and wounded 25 others.
June 15, 1998: Richmond, Virginia A 14-year-old student of Armstrong High School wounded a teacher and a school volunteer.[62]
December 10, 1998: Detroit, Michigan Professor Andrzej Olbrot was killed by graduate student Wlodzimierz Dedecjus, 48.[63]
April 20, 1999: Columbine, Colorado (Columbine High School massacre) Eric Harris, 18, and Dylan Klebold, 17, killed 12 students and one teacher, and wounded 21 others before committing suicide at Columbine High School.
May 20, 1999: Conyers, Georgia (Heritage High School shooting) Six students injured by Thomas Solomon Jr., 15.
November 19, 1999: Deming, New Mexico A 13-year-old girl fatally shot at Deming Middle School by Victor Cordova Jr., 13. Cordova stated he had intended to commit suicide but was jostled by others and the gun moved.[64]

February 29, 2000: Flint, Michigan At Buell Elementary School, 6-year-old Dedrick Owens, the youngest-ever school shooter, shot and killed classmate Kayla Rolland.[65]
May 26, 2000: Lake Worth, Florida Lake Worth Middle School Florida teacher Barry Grunow was fatally shot by his student, 13-year-old Nathaniel Brazill, who had returned to school after being sent home at 1 p.m. by the assistant principal for throwing water balloons. Brazill returned to school on his bike with a 5 inch Raven and four bullets stolen from his grandfather the week before. Brazill was an honor student. Grunow was a popular teacher and Brazill's favorite.[65]
August 28, 2000: University of Arkansas shooting at Fayetteville, Arkansas At approximately 12:14 pm, Dr. John R. Locke, 67, Director of the Comparative Literature Program was shot and killed in his office by James E. Kelly, 36, a Comparative Literature PhD candidate who had recently been dismissed from the program for lack of progress towards his degree. Kelly shot Dr. Locke three times before taking his own life in Dr. Locke's office after it was cordoned off by campus police.[66][67][68]
September 26, 2000: Darrel Johnson, 13, offender in Louisiana school shooting with 1 student fatality.[65]
March 5, 2001: Charles Andrew William, age 15, offender in California school shooting at Santana High School, 15 wounded 2 of which died.[65]
March 30, 2001: Donald R. Burt Jr., age 18, offender in Indiana school shooting with 1 student fatality.[65]
September 24, 2003: John Jason McLaughlin, age 15, offender in Minnesota school shooting with 2 student fatalities.[65]
February 2, 2004: Unidentified offender in Washington, DC school shooting with 1 student fatality.[65]
May 7, 2004: Unidentified 17 year old offender in Maryland school shooting with 1 student fatality.[65]


FYI: that's more than half of 51 in a ten-year period. Ten years is less than half of the period covered by rickyp's "insightful" post.

I'm not really sure, but I don't believe rickyp's "argument" is very effective.
User avatar
Emissary
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: 12 Jun 2006, 2:01 am

Post 07 Jan 2013, 4:03 pm

The way I read Tom's post was that he's against the idea of having armed guards in schools, which is something I'd agree with irrespective of whether we see any guns being banned. The idea is just a kneejerk from certain gun rights advocates to try and head off any regulation in the wake of the recent shootings, but it doesn't make any sense. You can be broadly supportive of the 2nd Amendment, as Tom is, without resorting to ludicrous ideas like that.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Jan 2013, 4:19 pm

Fate, I simply counted the school shootings since 91... Because Tom seems to think school shootings are abnormal. They aren't.
The only pattern is an increasing frequency, and the use of more powerful weapons.
You seem to think that this acceptable or must be accepted because there is nothing that can be effectively done to prevent the violence. Is that right? (You're all over the map reflexively disagreeing with every point made, so its hard to tell anymore.)
If not, and I've missed something please inform us of what you think is the most effective way of reducing the incidence and body count from mass shootings (in particular) and gun violence.
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7462
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 07 Jan 2013, 4:46 pm

Why don't you say what you think would work? You only disagree...
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 07 Jan 2013, 5:05 pm

rickyp wrote:Fate, I simply counted the school shootings since 91...


In other words, you made no argument at all.

Because Tom seems to think school shootings are abnormal. They aren't.
The only pattern is an increasing frequency, and the use of more powerful weapons.


So, to prove this you cut and paste a list that includes a suicide (at least one) and shows that more than half of the shootings occurred during the ban that you proclaim will reduce shootings?

Oh wait. You don't "proclaim" it. I forgot. You're not really making an argument.

You seem to think that this acceptable or must be accepted because there is nothing that can be effectively done to prevent the violence. Is that right?


No, I don't think it's acceptable, so, no, your assumption is wrong.

(You're all over the map reflexively disagreeing with every point made, so its hard to tell anymore.)


You actually didn't make a point.

If not, and I've missed something please inform us of what you think is the most effective way of reducing the incidence and body count from mass shootings (in particular) and gun violence.


No, I won't. Why should I make an attempt at a substantive argument? You don't.

Furthermore, nothing I say will matter to you or those who believe assault guns are the problem. This is actually ironic since your list proves the assault weapons ban did nothing to change things.

Your list is useless in trying to prove anything. It doesn't tell us what weapons were used in all cases. And, many of the shootings would not be prevented under any likely gun control laws.

9mm semi?

22-cal rifle?

If you want to make a case, you'll actually have to do some work. Posting a link of a list that is as indiscriminate as this one is pretty useless.

Now, you have another opportunity to try to twist what I've said or suggest I don't care or say I have no idea what to do--or whatever your current level of dishonesty drives you to post.

Here's my bottom line:

1. Gun control won't stop shootings.

2. Banning guns won't happen.

3. Most of you arguing here have seen pictures of guns, but couldn't get the safety off if your life depended on it. I think I got my first rifle when I was 9. I spent three years in the Army, more than 20 in law enforcement. You can theorize all you'd like, but reality is a tough opponent. Wrestle with it.

4. You can keep blathering or posting inapt lists, but I've little interest in debating minutiae with folks whose ideas are on the fringes of political discussion.

5. If anything passes through Congress, I'll be back.
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: 19 Dec 2000, 4:40 pm

Post 07 Jan 2013, 6:32 pm

I guess I don't understand why someone would get angry (DF) when the other side makes what he perceives as bad arguments. I love it when the other side makes bad arguments, because I get to (pardon the expression) shoot those arguments down...
DF likes to lump those arguments he can validly criticize with those he cannot answer. Or argue that the arguments come from someone who is a leftist (me) or not from this country (Danivon or Ricky). Or argue that we have no expertise about a subject, even though the arguments don't require such expertise..
.But DF gets to criticize my arguments too.
Not that DF does not make some good arguments, he does, and we certainly need a far-right guy that we can bounce our idea off of. It wouldn't be much fun If I were arguing with Danivon or Ricky, because we would agree too much. If we didn't have DF, we might have to invent him...
At the end of the day, none of us have us the power to change anything. These discussions are an intellectual exercise that hopefully provides some enjoyment for those that participate (or observe). Why get too exercised about it?
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: 19 Dec 2000, 4:40 pm

Post 07 Jan 2013, 7:07 pm

By the way, only someone who is pretty far out on the right would think that I am a leftist (or at least on the fringes of the Democratic Party)...
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 08 Jan 2013, 8:05 am

fate
In other words, you made no argument at all


That's right. All I did was provide information that showed that school shootings of any kind were common since 91. And I didn't cut and paste, I only provided a link that provided a source for my claim.
You cut and paste to argue against something i hadn't claimed...

But I appreciate your "bottom line".
Here's my bottom line:

1. Gun control won't stop shootings. Even though in every country where there is effective gun control its incontrovertible that shootings have decreased.. Hell every jurisdiction if you include successful gun control in places like Tombstone Arizona..
2. Banning guns won't happen. Depends on political will doesn't it? Although you are probably right in the US, though an "assault weapons ban" might happen. Whether its effective depends on the law and the enforcement thereof.
3. Most of you arguing here have seen pictures of guns, but couldn't get the safety off if your life depended on it. I think I got my first rifle when I was 9. I spent three years in the Army, more than 20 in law enforcement. You can theorize all you'd like, but reality is a tough opponent. Wrestle with it. First hand knowledge of guns doesn't really add a lot to one's understanding, that expert statistical analysis can demonstrate... ..But, just for the record, I shot guns at a range from the age of 14 through 17...

4. You can keep blathering or posting inapt lists, but I've little interest in debating minutiae with folks whose ideas are on the fringes of political discussion. You aren't really debating with us Fate. You're concocting arguments that you think we've made, posting hypothetical situations as probability rather than alternative plausibility, , and ignoring arguments you have no answer for...
5. If anything passes through Congress, I'll be back.
Oh, you'll be back.....
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 08 Jan 2013, 8:08 am

bbauska
Why don't you say what you think would work? You only disagree.


Australia has shown what would work. It would be much harder to effect such a ban in the US, but then the problem in the US is much, much, larger...
I doubt the political will is there to accomplish this however. It will probably take a few more events like Sandy Hook, Columbine and the theatre shooting in Colorado...
However, its a pretty good bet that a repeat event will occur in the next 4 to 5 months... and then again...
Eventually the toll will create the will. Wars become unpopular when the human cost becomes too great, and the "war to keep guns" (to borrow from O'reilly and his "war on Christmas"), is costly. And especially costly on the emotional psyche of the nation.
The three G legs of modern conservatism since Reagan, Guns, Gays and God ...
The fight for gay rights is petering out for conservatives.
The influence of fundamental religion is diminishing.
The love affair with guns may be at the beginning of a turning point... But its looks to be the leg that has had the greatest affiliation but the leg with the greatest negative cost to Americans. The lives of innocents.
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7462
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 09 Jan 2013, 8:33 pm

http://www.thewrap.com/tv/column-post/chris-rock-you-should-have-have-mortgage-buy-gun-72071

This may be the only time I agree with Chris Rock.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 10 Jan 2013, 2:01 am

Hmmm. Of course loners' mothers owning property (and having a mortgage) and so getting guns won't be a problem...

I suspect you agree with Chris Rock on more sane ideas than this. What about people who own their homes outright?
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7462
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 10 Jan 2013, 8:29 am

I have heard little of Chris Rock, and I don't like his movies. What I have heard did not impress.

Are homes property?

Do you think he was being tongue in cheek?
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 10 Jan 2013, 9:47 am

The question of political will, and what will be acceptable to the American public may be hinted at in the recent CNN poll.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/image ... r19.4p.pdf

95% favour back ground checks on all sales, and 62% FAVOUR A ban on the manufacture, sale and possession of semi-automatic assault guns, such as the AK-47..

High profile activists like Gabrielle Giffords who's $20 million for her PAC targeted at improving gun laws .... will give the movement juice too. So perhaps there is enough political will to move something like a ban on assault weapons and large magazines... There enough House Republicans in areas where support for enhanced gun control is large (New Jersey etc.) that they might be willing to buck the southern wing and get behind legislation...
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7462
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 10 Jan 2013, 10:14 am

Quite honestly, I do not care about polls. I care about the following of the Constitution. I have said before, change the US Constitution and outlaw weapons/clarify the meaning.

Heck, I agree about background checks. I am all for gun training. Just not restricting the ownership of weapons.

You can talk about political will all you want.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 10 Jan 2013, 12:55 pm

bbauska
I care about the following of the Constitution.


Its doubtful that back ground checks, or outlawing large magazines or assault rifles will be ruled unconstitutional. And that looks like the most likely course of action by Biden's group.
So really it does come down to political will. If over 90% support back ground checks of all sales, and registration of all sales, and over 60% support banning "assault weapons" (A workable definition will be important) then its an issue that Obama and the Dems would love to push.
Which, politically will mean if Republicans band against the legislation its one more losing position for them. (Even if they succeed in stonewalling it paints the party in a negative fashion for more than 6 out of 10 voters...)
I'm guessing there are enough Republicans (in the North East) who will be vulnerable on this issue in 2016, that they support the upcoming legislation.