Purple wrote:Fate and RickyP: It's somewhat amusing watching you two go at it in the middle of July, commenting on the two campaigns and the direction they are taking. !

Purple wrote:Knocks yourselves out, boys. You're the real entertainment!

Barack Obama has developed quite a record as a liar. He lied for more than a decade about where he was born. He lied about many aspects of his life in his fictional “memoir.” He lied about his Chicago years and has activities and associations there. (Has anyone ever asked the question, what did Obama do when he lived in Chicago, and whom did he know there, since it seems that all of the activities and associations of which we have a record are now, as Nixon might say, inoperative.) To answer my own question, I think a candidate likely can lie his way into office, but I doubt that in incumbent president can lie his way to re-election. For the first time in his life, apparently, Barack Obama has a record.

Which doesn’t stop him from trying. The Obama campaign’s current Bain Capital smear, which many media outlets have taken up, ranks with Quemoy, Matsu and Checkers as absurd campaign “issues.” But it is all that a flailing, out-of-ammo campaign has to offer.

Oh it's even better then that. Ricky created a thread in April that said that Obama already had it sewn up and that there is nothing, barring some major outside event, that Romney can do to change that

rickyp wrote:arch

Oh it's even better then that. Ricky created a thread in April that said that Obama already had it sewn up and that there is nothing, barring some major outside event, that Romney can do to change that

.

So far so good.

2004 Jul 19-21 49/47/4

Oh it's even better then that. Ricky created a thread in April that said that Obama already had it sewn up and that there is nothing, barring some major outside event, that Romney can do to change that

It's hard for me to imagine that anyone would see that as material

rickyp wrote:arch

Oh it's even better then that. Ricky created a thread in April that said that Obama already had it sewn up and that there is nothing, barring some major outside event, that Romney can do to change that

I made a pretty strong arguement in April that the electorate had pretty much made their choice, and that the narrative of the election was going to work against Mitt so the small undecided group wasn't going to be won by him in the large majority he needed....
But of course there are always surprises. But are they going to come from Obama or from the guy who won't release his tax records, or bank accounts. ?
Turns out that even when he was in that vague " not really in charge but still owner of Bain" state
he was indisputedly in charge of things in Salt Lake City that are turning out to be embarressing surprises.
Yes, nothing says US capitalism like making the 2002 Olympic Torchbearers uniforms with slave labour in an embargoed military dictatorship ....
If this isn't just the icing on the "job producers" cake.....
http://www.cleanclothes.org/newslist/151
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=1835

Obama doesn't need breaks like this... and yet....

the formal statement of the meaning or significance of a word, phrase, idiom, etc., as found in dictionaries. An online dictionary resource, such as Dictionary.com, can give users direct, immediate access to the definitions of a term, allowing them to compare definitions from various dictionaries and stay up to date with an ever-expanding vocabulary

the study of the way the sentences of a language are constructed; morphology and syntax.
these features or constructions themselves: English grammar

In what way am I misquoting you?