Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 14 May 2012, 12:23 pm

What 'hate' are we talking about, here? Steve's quotes are not conclusive as he seems to think, so what examples can you provide, Russell?
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 3239
Joined: 29 Jan 2003, 9:54 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:23 pm

danivon wrote:What 'hate' are we talking about, here? Steve's quotes are not conclusive as he seems to think, so what examples can you provide, Russell?

Well, his response to a question about lack of contact between him and Obama in June of 2009 was
Them Jews aren't going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter, that he'll talk to me in five years when he's a lame duck, or in eight years when he's out of office."
or his response on why Obama didn't send anybody to the Darfur conference
T]he Jewish vote, the A-I-P-A-C vote, that’s controlling him, that would not let him send representation to the Darfur Review Conference, that’s talking this craziness on this trip, cause they’re Zionists, they would not let him talk to someone who calls a spade what it is
Now I know these are post Obama but when you add that to what was said before, such as an April 2003 comment calling Condi Rice Condaskeeza Rice, would seem to create a pattern of conduct that includes preaching hate.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:28 pm

danivon wrote:
Doctor Fate wrote:What's the world's problem? White people.
Umm, no. The problem was 'greed'.


Read it again: "White man's greed."

That is not the same as general, world-wide "greed."

Yet, it is consistent with the theme of Obama's spiritual home for 20 years: read the statement of faith; review the sermons. It's not that racial division is the problem. "White" is the problem. "Black" is the solution.

But, wait, there's more:
I bet a site called 'Stop Obama' is going to be balanced!


Well-thought out response! You're so insightful.

After all, how dare they quote Obama's own autobiography! The nerve!

“We don’t buy into these false divisions here. It’s not about income, Barack. Cops don’t check my bank account when they pull me over and make me spread-eagle against the car. These miseducated brothers, like that sociologist at the University of Chicago, talking about ‘the declining significance of race.’ Now, what country is he living in?”

Are you saying that race is no longer significant in the USA? Or that blacks are disproportionately suspected of crimes?


Danivon must mean: "one who carefully constructs towering straw men, douses them with kerosene, and then sets them ablaze."

I did not say anything of the sort.

Wright portrays the world as Whites holding Blacks down. He portrays America as the problem in the world. Those are the consistent themes in his "preaching."

Now, in the quote he says there is no decline in the "significance" of race. None? So, we were just as likely to elect a black man President in the 1970's as now? Really?

The crime issue is not one he mentioned in the quote you cited, so I'm not going to divert attention to talk about something you can't be bothered to research either.

“Life’s not safe for a black man in this country, Barack. Never has been. Probably never will be.” [201]
Please show us how the murder rate of blacks is the same as that of other races, that'll show us that there's no difference in safety


Sure, right after you do two things:

1. Point out the relevance of what you want me to defend. I never made any such statement. If you want me to rebut everything Wright ever said, well, that's going to take some time.

2. Show me that the primary driver of violence against blacks is not, in fact, blacks themselves. Good luck!

Afterward, in the parking lot, I sat in my car and thumbed through a silver brochure that I’d picked up in the reception area. It contained a set of guiding principles-a “Black Value System”-that the congregation had adopted in 1979. At the top of the list was a commitment to God, “who will give us the strength to give up prayerful passivism [sic] and become Black Christian activists, soldiers for Black freedom and the dignity of all humankind.” Then a commitment to the black community and black family, education, the work ethic, discipline, and self-respect. . . .
So, umm he's damned by a list headed up by a commitment to God?


I suspected as much. Reading comprehension has been deemphasized in Britain. Was that a commitment to "God" or to "Black?" Do a little counting, won't you? Which word comes up more in that quote--"God" or "Black?"

By the way, 'passivism' is not misspelled- it's not 'pacifism', but passivenss that is what is being asked to give up.


Btw, I was not the typist, so send your email to the appropriate party.

But I see your point. How dare Wright's church promote education, family, discipline, work ethic, etc. And how dare Obama respect that.


No, you can't see my point. That's because you cannot read.

Actually, no I don't see your point.


Answered above. I pity you, but I don't have to play your stupid games.

A sensible, heartfelt list…There was one particular passage in Trinity’s brochure that stood out, though, a commandment more self-conscious in its tone, requiring greater elaboration. “A Disavowal of the Pursuit of Middleclassness,” the heading read. “While it is permissible to chase ‘middleincomeness’ with all our might,” the text stated, those blessed with the talent or good fortune to achieve success in the American mainstream must avoid the “psychological entrapment of Black ‘middleclassness’ that hypnotizes the successful brother or sister into believing they are better than the rest and teaches them to think in terms of ‘we’ and ‘they’ instead of ‘US’!” [202] . . .
Nothing wrong with that either, really. There's the problem of working class people who develop a chip on their shoulder and see all who 'escape' upwards as class traitors. And that's divisive. Then there's the attitude of people who do obtain a better life who look down on their former peers. And that's divisive too.


One socialist approving of another. I'm shocked.

That the press failed to investigate this doesn't exonerate the Man.
Waah! You need to be spoonfed by the 'press'? Obama wrote this stuff in his autobiography...

And why this 'Man' stuff? Is this another symptom of your obsession?


It's to help you who worship at his feet. If you're not familiar with the colloquial use of "the Man," I'll be happy to explain it. I don't think that is the problem.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:34 pm

Archduke Russell John wrote:
danivon wrote:What 'hate' are we talking about, here? Steve's quotes are not conclusive as he seems to think, so what examples can you provide, Russell?

Well, his response to a question about lack of contact between him and Obama in June of 2009 was
Them Jews aren't going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter, that he'll talk to me in five years when he's a lame duck, or in eight years when he's out of office."
or his response on why Obama didn't send anybody to the Darfur conference
T]he Jewish vote, the A-I-P-A-C vote, that’s controlling him, that would not let him send representation to the Darfur Review Conference, that’s talking this craziness on this trip, cause they’re Zionists, they would not let him talk to someone who calls a spade what it is
Now I know these are post Obama but when you add that to what was said before, such as an April 2003 comment calling Condi Rice Condaskeeza Rice, would seem to create a pattern of conduct that includes preaching hate.


More here.

The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied.


In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01. White America and the western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just 'disappeared' as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:38 pm

Well, indeed they are post-Obama. Which means that Obama could not have sat through them in sermons. Perhaps Rev Wright was embittered by something that happened around 4 years ago...

The Condaleeza Rice jibe is nasty, but it's not the same as 'preaching hate'. What 'hate' was he preaching before 2008? That is what I am asking for.
User avatar
Emissary
 
Posts: 7378
Joined: 16 Feb 2000, 9:55 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:39 pm

I'm mildly surprised that even this group cares enough about this topic to make 4 pages of posts about it.
User avatar
Emissary
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: 12 Jun 2006, 2:01 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:42 pm

Every thrread here runs to pages and pages. Pretty much all the posts worth reading happen in the first 1 or 2 though.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:49 pm

Doctor Fate wrote:And why this 'Man' stuff? Is this another symptom of your obsession?


It's to help you who worship at his feet. If you're not familiar with the colloquial use of "the Man," I'll be happy to explain it. I don't think that is the problem.[/quote]Oh, please grow up. I'm not into worship of anyone or anything. Obama is just a guy, and frankly I see more reference to him as some kind of icon or demigod from sarcastic right wingers trying to use denigration as a means to argue.

Again, I don't 'worship' Obama. I think he's a better bet for President than the alternative, and you disagree. Why the need to make this personal?
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:51 pm

Sassenach wrote:Every thrread here runs to pages and pages. Pretty much all the posts worth reading happen in the first 1 or 2 though.
So, we need more threads then?

What would you want to discuss, Sass. Can we talk about the Coalition's education policy?
User avatar
Emissary
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: 12 Jun 2006, 2:01 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:53 pm

Trying to discuss British topics here is essentially pointless. I'd be willing to join in, but something tells me the threads would die a fairly speedy death.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 14 May 2012, 1:55 pm

danivon wrote:Well, indeed they are post-Obama. Which means that Obama could not have sat through them in sermons. Perhaps Rev Wright was embittered by something that happened around 4 years ago...

The Condaleeza Rice jibe is nasty, but it's not the same as 'preaching hate'. What 'hate' was he preaching before 2008? That is what I am asking for.


Yet, when it has been posted, you blithely ignore it. The quotes from Obama's book were not so great.

Wright also famously blamed the US for 9/11.

Since you can't sort it out, maybe this will help:

Sen. Barack Obama's pastor says blacks should not sing "God Bless America" but "God damn America."

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor for the last 20 years at the Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's south side, has a long history of what even Obama's campaign aides concede is "inflammatory rhetoric," including the assertion that the United States brought on the 9/11 attacks with its own "terrorism."

In a campaign appearance earlier this month, Sen. Obama said, "I don't think my church is actually particularly controversial." He said Rev. Wright "is like an old uncle who says things I don't always agree with," telling a Jewish group that everyone has someone like that in their family.

Rev. Wright married Obama and his wife Michelle, baptized their two daughters and is credited by Obama for the title of his book, "The Audacity of Hope."

An ABC News review of dozens of Rev. Wright's sermons, offered for sale by the church, found repeated denunciations of the U.S. based on what he described as his reading of the Gospels and the treatment of black Americans.

"The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people," he said in a 2003 sermon. "God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme."

In addition to damning America, he told his congregation on the Sunday after Sept. 11, 2001 that the United States had brought on al Qaeda's attacks because of its own terrorism.


"We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye," Rev. Wright said in a sermon on Sept. 16, 2001.

"We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost," he told his congregation.

Sen. Obama told the New York Times he was not at the church on the day of Rev. Wright's 9/11 sermon. "The violence of 9/11 was inexcusable and without justification," Obama said in a recent interview. "It sounds like he was trying to be provocative," Obama told the paper.

. . .

"I wouldn't call it radical. I call it being black in America," said one congregation member outside the church last Sunday.

"He has impacted the life of Barack Obama so much so that he wants to portray that feeling he got from Rev. Wright onto the country because we all need something positive," said another member of the congregation.

Rev. Wright, who declined to be interviewed by ABC News, is considered one of the country's 10 most influential black pastors, according to members of the Obama campaign.

Obama has praised at least one aspect of Rev. Wright's approach, referring to his "social gospel" and his focus on Africa, "and I agree with him on that."


Here's a mild medley: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEMZHQsQJ6Y

You might think he's not hate-filled. But, that doesn't say much for your discernment.
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 3239
Joined: 29 Jan 2003, 9:54 am

Post 14 May 2012, 2:01 pm

Screw this. I do not accept the premise of your question. In reviewing the comments you referenced Owen, I disagree with the above parsing of Wrights reported comments. They are hateful.

Given that, all of it combined shows a pattern of conduct that when added Obama's admission of hearing the Reverend making controversial statements indicates Obama was clearly aware of Wright's bigotry while maintaining his membership in the church and considering Wright a mentor. Either way, none of this changes my point. Obama's response to Wright does not shows more character then Romney's response to actions 45 years ago does.

As a matter of fact, I would say Obama's reaction shows less character because he was willing to sit in the pews and listen to it until it became politically inexpedient.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 14 May 2012, 2:04 pm

Sassenach wrote:Trying to discuss British topics here is essentially pointless. I'd be willing to join in, but something tells me the threads would die a fairly speedy death.
Yeah.

Steve - you are quoting the stuff from 2008. We already saw it all back then, and that's what the fuss was about back then. I'm not asking for repetition of stuff we've known for years.

This is one reason the threads are getting pointless - repetition, repetition, repetition.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 14 May 2012, 2:12 pm

Danivon wrote:Steve - you are quoting the stuff from 2008. We already saw it all back then, and that's what the fuss was about back then. I'm not asking for repetition of stuff we've known for years.


So, what are you suggesting? That Wright became a racist in 2008 and when then-Senator Obama found out, he left the church?

That would not comport with the church's statement of faith or with Obama's quotes from Wright that were included in his autobiography.

If it just doesn't matter to you that Wright is a racist and preaches outrageous things that Obama thought were okay until they became a political liability, that is your right. It makes no sense, but it's your right.

Wright became enamored of Black Liberation Theology in the 60's. It's the foundation of his church.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 14 May 2012, 2:17 pm

I know what Black Liberation Theology is. I know what Liberation Theology is. I know you see both as heretical, which is perhaps clouding your position on whether it's also 'hateful'

There's a difference between talking about race and being racist.