Did you watch the State Dept try to explain the discrepancy? Did you watch Carney?

No mistake?

I feel sorry for you.

No apology?

All it does is condemn the exercising of free speech.

Really sad.

Doctor Fate wrote:No apology?

All it does is condemn the exercising of free speech.

It condemned a deliberate insult. But there is no apology. It's hardly different from the Romney statement, but I don't see you call that an 'apology'.

Really sad.

Sure is.

fate

He is the President. Our embassies and consulates should have been on high alert and highly protected on 9/11. That they weren't is whose fault? Bush?

By this reasoning you'd claim Bush bears major responsibility for the original 9/11.
Most of us blame Osama bin laden.

rickyp wrote:fate

He is the President. Our embassies and consulates should have been on high alert and highly protected on 9/11. That they weren't is whose fault? Bush?

By this reasoning you'd claim Bush bears major responsibility for the original 9/11.
Most of us blame Osama bin laden.

New low for you.

9/11 is a known desirable date (from the perspective of the terrorists). They delight in striking on such days. There is some evidence of intel warning of attacks on embassies.

Not really analogous to 9/11, unless you specialize in specious reasoning.

Oh right. It's you.