-

- rickyp
- Statesman
-
- Posts: 11324
- Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am
15 Sep 2015, 9:27 am
geo
Why was Bernie Sanders even at this event? I have no idea, but the fact that he went there, looking for common ground was pretty presidential, if I do say
"It is easy to go out and talk with people who agree with you."
Bernie Sanders
If the Liberty University students never hear any ideas that challenge what they are taught at Liberty, they'll never change. If Bernie can frame his ideas so that they are challenged, his appeal to like minded people who already support those ideas grows.
-

- Doctor Fate
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 21062
- Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am
16 Sep 2015, 2:15 pm
bbauska wrote:Yes, you are correct. How about this one?
"Why is Mrs. Clinton a candidate at all?

Well, all I can say is, "Not so fast."
Here's her thinking: she loses Iowa and New Hampshire . . . so what? Her strength is among African-Americans, who are a good share of the electorate in the south. She will crush Sanders there.
Furthermore, I understand she's floating the idea of Bill as a running mate. I think it's questionable, constitutionally, but she wants to attach herself to his popularity. What is clear: she won't quit unless she's hauled off in cuffs.
-

- bbauska
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm
16 Sep 2015, 3:25 pm
I only say why because she is showing little, if any, shame. If there were as many scandals involving me, I would not dream of running for POTUS.
-

- Doctor Fate
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 21062
- Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am
16 Sep 2015, 4:37 pm
bbauska wrote:I only say why because she is showing little, if any, shame. If there were as many scandals involving me, I would not dream of running for POTUS.
My "favorite" line of hers: "I take full responsibility." It's my "favorite" because it means nothing. What are the consequences?
None!
No consequences = no responsibility.
-

- Archduke Russell John
- Dignitary
-
- Posts: 3239
- Joined: 29 Jan 2003, 9:54 am
20 Sep 2015, 7:31 am
Doctor Fate wrote:Furthermore, I understand she's floating the idea of Bill as a running mate. I think it's questionable, constitutionally, but she wants to attach herself to his popularity.
Actually, I think it is the exact opposite. She was asked in an interview with Mario Lopez (of Saved by the Bell fame) if she would consider picking Bill as a running mate. Her response was that she couldn't because he is ineligible for the office of Vice President having already served his constitutionally limited 2 full terms as President.
-

- freeman3
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm
21 Sep 2015, 11:01 pm
Hillary Clinton rises in CNN poll...
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/21/politics/ ... ders-2016/How is that possible ? Thought she was done...
-

- Doctor Fate
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 21062
- Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am
25 Sep 2015, 1:53 pm
Oh, she is. Only Hillary and Trumpster have high-enough negatives to almost ensure they won't win.
Meanwhile,
the lies just keep stacking up for Hillary. WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration has discovered a chain of emails that Hillary Rodham Clinton failed to turn over when she provided what she said was the full record of work-related correspondence as secretary of state, officials said Friday, adding to the growing questions related to the Democratic presidential front-runner's unusual usage of a private email account and server while in government.
The messages were exchanged with retired Gen. David Petraeus when he headed the military's U.S. Central Command, responsible for running the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They began before Clinton entered office and continued into her first days at the State Department. They largely pertained to personnel matters and don't appear to deal with highly classified material, officials said, but their existence challenges Clinton's claim that she has handed over the entirety of her work emails from the account.
On the penalty of PERJURY, she signed a State Department form saying she'd turned over all State-related materials. Oops.
Then there's the interesting
Abedin situation, wherein she billed more hours in 6 months than someone in her category is allowed to work in an entire year.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton greenlighted paperwork that changed her top aide Huma Abedin’s job status to “special government employee” — a classification that allowed Abedin to work for an outside consulting firm and the Clinton Foundation at the same time she was advising Clinton at State.
According to documents obtained by conservative group Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, Clinton was the immediate supervisor who approved the title change that came with the new post on March 23, 2012, permitting her then-deputy chief of staff to work several jobs at once.
The whole idea that this was just something that happened at the State Department with some employee has been laughable from the beginning. Abedin has been joined at the hip to Clinton for the past seventeen years, beginning when she was still in college but managed to land a position working in the White House for the then First Lady in 1996. Most of the interesting emails to come off of Hillary’s server so far were all electronic conversations between the two of them where Huma demonstrates that she essentially controlled Clinton’s calendar and access to the State Department. There wasn’t going to be a special sweetheart deal cut for her to go work for a powerful Clinton Foundation donor without Hillary knowing about it.
It's going to be a death of a thousand cuts,
which is just fine by me:Under FOIA, by contrast, the agency is required by law to provide plaintiffs with a complete inventory and broad description of every document it has that pertains to the request—but is withholding. This is known as a Vaughn index. The State Department on Monday handed over its Vaughn index to Citizens United and, boy, are these email descriptions revealing.
We find that the State Department has—but is not releasing—an email chain between then-Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills and a Clinton Foundation board member about the secretary of state’s planned trip to Africa. We find that the State Department has—but is not releasing—emails between Ms. Mills and foundation staff discussing “invitations to foreign business executives to attend the annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative.” We find many undisclosed email chains in which State Department officials talk with Clinton Foundation officials about Bill Clinton speeches and Bill Clinton travel, including to events in North Korea and Congo.
Huma Abedin, a longtime confidante of Mrs. Clinton’s, was somehow allowed to work, simultaneously, at the State Department, the Clinton Foundation and as a consultant to Teneo—a consulting firm run by Clinton loyalist Doug Band. All three of Ms. Abedin’s hats come into play in an undisclosed email exchange regarding a 2012 dinner in Ireland. As the Washington Examiner reported in May, Mrs. Clinton received an award at the dinner from a Clinton Foundation donor. The ceremony was promoted by Teneo. Mrs. Clinton attended in her official capacity as secretary of state. Sort through that.
We already know that the Clinton Foundation continued to take foreign money even while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state. We now know this was only the start of the entwining. These email summaries show that the Clinton Foundation was the State Department and the State Department was the Clinton Foundation. All one, big, seamless, Clinton-promoting entity. We would know far more if State released the full emails. It is citing personal privacy as one reason not to make some public. In others, it claims the emails “shed no light on the conduct of U.S. Government business.”
She's dodging and, frankly, not that nimble. Strassel continues:
What Democrats are only beginning to understand is that 35 FOIA lawsuits is a guarantee of weekly Clinton email-news bombs. This isn’t ending. The polls keep measuring Mrs. Clinton in theoretical matchups. The only matchup that matters is this one: Clinton vs. FOIA. And FOIA is crushing it.
-

- freeman3
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm
25 Sep 2015, 3:47 pm
Maybe if the Republicans had a viable candidate this would be concerning. Yawn...
-

- freeman3
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm
25 Sep 2015, 4:00 pm
I don't know if Hillary will suffer a political death of a thousand cuts from these emails...but I am thinking we will here at Redscape from being lashed by DF about it... Ow! Ouch! Ugh!...we surrender!
-

- Doctor Fate
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 21062
- Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am
25 Sep 2015, 4:18 pm
freeman3 wrote:I don't know if Hillary will suffer a political death of a thousand cuts from these emails...but I am thinking we will here at Redscape from being lashed by DF about it... Ow! Ouch! Ugh!...we surrender!
Laugh it up.
Let's see . . .
her story on her server has changed. She lies to the American people. She commits perjury.
Oh, and she "overlooked" (apparently)
900 emails relating to Benghazi. One source close to the investigation said they include a chain of 900 Libya-related emails that Clinton failed to turn over when she provided what she said was the full record of work-related correspondence when she was secretary of state. Not all of them are related to the 2012 Benghazi attacks.
Hillary for President 2016: "We'll let you know when she's ready to stop lying. Just vote for her like a good Democrat."
-

- freeman3
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm
25 Sep 2015, 7:18 pm
Hillary: "it's me or a crazy right-wing guy."
-

- danivon
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 16006
- Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am
26 Sep 2015, 2:42 am
freeman3 wrote:Hillary: "it's me or a crazy right-wing guy."
Unless Fiorina gets the nomination. Which I think Hillary would love.
-

- bbauska
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm
26 Sep 2015, 7:07 am
danivon wrote:freeman3 wrote:Hillary: "it's me or a crazy right-wing guy."
Unless Fiorina gets the nomination. Which I think Hillary would love.
So all the Republican candidates are crazy in your opinion?
-

- rickyp
- Statesman
-
- Posts: 11324
- Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am
26 Sep 2015, 8:05 am
danivon
Unless Fiorina gets the nomination
How will those with a fetish for absolute truth take Carly?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-schm ... 88902.htmlhttp://www.salon.com/2015/09/25/carly_f ... ven_worse/This is "Death Panels" all over again.
-

- Doctor Fate
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 21062
- Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am
26 Sep 2015, 8:54 am
So, "absolute truth" = "not yet convicted of perjury?" or "has never told the truth about her emails, server, or much of anything?"