Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 123
Joined: 02 Jun 2012, 9:41 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 7:30 am

Doctor Fate wrote:[
But, that's okay. You pretend that we are incredibly lucky (given the odds against a climate that would sustain life), live in a random universe even though order exists all around you, and now you deny that scientists understand what human life is.


It's not luck, really. In a way, things had to be the ordered way they are, whether you believe in a creator or not. If some slightly different universe were created (or arose, however you choose to think about it) with qualities that didn't allow for sustained life, then we wouldn't very likely be here to discuss, would we?
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 9:53 am

danivon wrote:DF, are you done or not?


Doctor Fate wrote:I won't argue metaphysics and you cannot argue with the science.


Those are my parameters.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 9:56 am

theshrizzz wrote:
Doctor Fate wrote:[
But, that's okay. You pretend that we are incredibly lucky (given the odds against a climate that would sustain life), live in a random universe even though order exists all around you, and now you deny that scientists understand what human life is.


It's not luck, really. In a way, things had to be the ordered way they are, whether you believe in a creator or not. If some slightly different universe were created (or arose, however you choose to think about it) with qualities that didn't allow for sustained life, then we wouldn't very likely be here to discuss, would we?


Right.

And, the atheist poses a mathematical probability virtually indistinguishable from zero. It's something akin to hitting the lottery every day for your lifetime and your progeny doing the same for several generations.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 123
Joined: 02 Jun 2012, 9:41 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 10:34 am

Doctor Fate wrote:
theshrizzz wrote:
Doctor Fate wrote:[
But, that's okay. You pretend that we are incredibly lucky (given the odds against a climate that would sustain life), live in a random universe even though order exists all around you, and now you deny that scientists understand what human life is.


It's not luck, really. In a way, things had to be the ordered way they are, whether you believe in a creator or not. If some slightly different universe were created (or arose, however you choose to think about it) with qualities that didn't allow for sustained life, then we wouldn't very likely be here to discuss, would we?


Right.

And, the atheist poses a mathematical probability virtually indistinguishable from zero. It's something akin to hitting the lottery every day for your lifetime and your progeny doing the same for several generations.


Yes, but it depends how you choose to look at the odds. You are right that the universe's current conditions and physical laws are extremely fine-tuned for life -- this very well can be viewed as evidence of a creator.

But I believe it is equally logical to suggest that in any of the innumerable other possibilities, you and I and whoever else wouldn't even be in existence to argue. So if we are in existence to argue, what other outcome that the one we have could even be possible?
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3741
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 20 Aug 2015, 10:42 am

True (in reference to DF's post) but the universe had an infinite number of chances over an infinite amount of time to get it right....and as far as we know life has only been created once... God went to an awful lot of trouble to to create a universe that is at least 13.8 billion light years wide to create life on one planet...seems like pretty darn good evidence of a lack of a plan to me...
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 10:50 am

Doctor Fate wrote:Right.

And, the atheist poses a mathematical probability virtually indistinguishable from zero. It's something akin to hitting the lottery every day for your lifetime and your progeny doing the same for several generations.
I defer to your superior knowledge of Mathematics, as I merely have a Bachelor of Science with Honours in the subject. But I am clear that there is a difference between "zero" and anything, however small it may be, that is not zero.

And whatever probability you are citing (and you are not even really doing that), it is based on a series of assumptions, not cast-iron facts.

Also, the "atheist" does not posit anything specific in terms of biogenesis. All they commonly posit is that there is no deity, or at least that they don't believe in one or see convincing evidence for one.

Perhaps it is best you do step away from the metaphysics.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 11:46 am

freeman3 wrote:True (in reference to DF's post) but the universe had an infinite number of chances over an infinite amount of time to get it right....and as far as we know life has only been created once... God went to an awful lot of trouble to to create a universe that is at least 13.8 billion light years wide to create life on one planet...seems like pretty darn good evidence of a lack of a plan to me...


Which is why I won't argue.

The light is on and you say it's dark. You believe as you wish.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 11:53 am

danivon wrote:
Doctor Fate wrote:Right.

And, the atheist poses a mathematical probability virtually indistinguishable from zero. It's something akin to hitting the lottery every day for your lifetime and your progeny doing the same for several generations.
I defer to your superior knowledge of Mathematics, as I merely have a Bachelor of Science with Honours in the subject. But I am clear that there is a difference between "zero" and anything, however small it may be, that is not zero.


Nor did I say it was zero. I said ". . . a mathematical probability virtually indistinguishable from zero."

Perhaps you should step away from the English language. Maybe French?
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3741
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 20 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm

Oh you mean the light from Nature? http://io9.com/9-predators-with-the-mos ... -510100768
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 12:29 pm

For someone who "won't argue" and "is done", you sure do post a lot to disagree with people...

I know what you wrote. The point is that a very small number IS distinguishable from zero, by definition.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 20 Aug 2015, 7:03 pm

danivon wrote:For someone who "won't argue" and "is done", you sure do post a lot to disagree with people...

I know what you wrote. The point is that a very small number IS distinguishable from zero, by definition.


Well then, you should note there is no difference between what you wrote and what I wrote.

And, I told you what I will and won't do. If you don't like that, great.
Last edited by Doctor Fate on 24 Aug 2015, 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7463
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 23 Aug 2015, 7:13 am

If a miscarriage is the same as abortion, why do women mourn a miscarriage?

I do not agree with RickyP that a miscarriage is the same as abortion. That is vile relativism.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 23 Aug 2015, 8:59 am

bbauska
If a miscarriage is the same as abortion, why do women mourn a miscarriage?


There are a lot of reasons they might. Or might not. (And a lot of what might be termed miscarriages by those who believe that life begins at conception are not even noticed by the mother)
There are also a lot of reason women are affected by the stress of choosing and undergoing abortion.

http://www.ramahinternational.org/post- ... drome.html

There are a lot of reasons women who give birth get depressed too.
Its complex and personal. Anyone who thinks they understand each woman's personal reasons and circumstance or who can council a course of action that works for each and everyone is arrogant.

Women deserve to be treated with dignity and have respect for their choices. They also deserve to be given the support of their community.
Instead, what goes on are attempts to shame women. (I'm thinking here of things like forced ultrasounds)
Families deserve the support of society, instead economic circumstance and the lack of progressive maternity or family leave forces stress on mothers that can only make abortion a more attractive option.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... n-20140115
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 26 Aug 2015, 11:37 am

rickyp wrote:Women deserve to be treated with dignity and have respect for their choices.


With respect to their choices, I ask "Really?" Are all choices equally valid? Does everyone have to respect a woman's "choice" to hook up with a drug dealer and gang member? Do we have to respect a woman's "choice" to have a baby with a man in prison doing life? Do we have to respect a woman's "choice" to get impregnated after her first 5 children are in fostercare because of an ongoing addiction? Are there no "choices" that deserve zero respect?

They also deserve to be given the support of their community.


No matter what they do?

Instead, what goes on are attempts to shame women. (I'm thinking here of things like forced ultrasounds)


Is that an attempt to shame women? Can you prove that? What if it is an attempt to inform women as to what they actually have inside of them? And, before you shout back a "they already know" response, then why do some change their minds after an ultrasound?

Families deserve the support of society, instead economic circumstance and the lack of progressive maternity or family leave forces stress on mothers that can only make abortion a more attractive option.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... n-20140115


Good move using Rolling Stone--a magazine that will lie in order to support its opinion (see made up rape story at UVA)

From your other source:

The Need for Ramah International is based on Jeremiah 31: 15
“A voice is heard in Ramah - mourning and great weeping. Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted because her children are no more.“

The research arm of Planned Parenthood (the world's largest abortion provider), the Alan Guttmacher Institute, states that, “An estimated 43% of women will have at least 1 abortion by the time they are 45 years old” (“Facts in Brief: Induced Abortion,” The Alan Guttmacher Institute, Washington‚ DC‚ January‚ 2000.). Clearly, the post abortive represent a large segment of our society. Yet few confess to this sin - especially to family and friends. Many deny comfort because they fear rejection and/or are unable to confront their own participation in ending their child’s life. Except for a handful of small ministry efforts offered through our nation’s 3‚200 pregnancy care centers and direct ministries, little is being done to reach these hearts with forgiveness and healing comfort available through Jesus Christ.

The Solution Ramah International Can Provide Our World
“This is what the Lord says, 'restrain your voice from weeping and your eyes from tears. For your work will be rewarded. Your children will return from the land of the enemy.” (Jeremiah 31: 16)

Ramah International's purpose is to bring individuals struggling with (PAS) to healing so they can cease mourning by finally grieving their children's deaths and live a normal life. It's heartbreaking work to touch this pain, yet helping them to acknowledge the loss of their children is the first step to PAS healing, and their “work will be rewarded.” When a person suffering from PAS names their child, the child becomes a permanent part of their parent's hearts. In essence, they are redeemed from Satan's grasp and “return from the land of the enemy.”

The Result of Ramah International's Work
“So there is hope for your future, declares the Lord.” (Jeremiah 31: 17a)

What is the hope for someone suffering from PAS? For many, it is to stop abortion from hurting other lives. This ministry believes that it is only through the healed voices of the post abortive attesting to the devastation abortion causes that it can finally be reduced. Post abortive individuals are the only ones who can attest to the fact that abortion is a horrible choice - not only for the mother but also for the child.
Company Profile
Many have chosen abortion because they believe what society has told them:

It is the only means to solve a crisis in their life.
It is only a blob of tissue.

Unfortunately, abortion does not solve their problems - it actually compounds them. PAS may take years surface, but the overwhelming majority of those who have abortions are confronted with the truth and reality of their decision to abort, and struggle with PAS. They come to the realization that they took the life of their own child. Many are also faced with the physical consequences of sterility. When they have been confronted with these harsh realities, many suffer symptoms of PAS.
.

Hmm, so "abortion is a horrible choice."

Are you sure you want to use that link? #googlewithoutreadingisdangerous.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 26 Aug 2015, 12:41 pm

fate
With respect to their choices, I ask "Really?" Are all choices equally valid? Does everyone have to respect a woman's "choice" to hook up with a drug dealer and gang member? Do we have to respect a woman's "choice" to have a baby with a man in prison doing life? Do we have to respect a woman's "choice" to get impregnated after her first 5 children are in fostercare because of an ongoing addiction? Are there no "choices" that deserve zero respect?


Every woman who is faced with an unplanned, unwanted pregnancy faces the same choice. To carry the pregnancy to term and give birth OR to abort the pregnancy as early as possible.
However the woman arrived at this dilemma she has the right to make that personal, private choice . Her personal circumstances don't change that right, and yes it should be respected.
Are you arguing that women should be forced to give birth always? Or that some, by their behavior have given up their right to choose because of their personal circumstance? Should they be locked up for 9 months to ensure they give birth?
The people might not conduct their lives with dignity, but they should still be treated with dignity. And that includes respecting their right to make this personal difficult choice.

Rickyp
Instead, what goes on are attempts to shame women. (I'm thinking here of things like forced ultrasounds)

Fate
Is that an attempt to shame women? Can you prove that? What if it is an attempt to inform women as to what they actually have inside of them? And, before you shout back a "they already know" response, then why do some change their minds after an ultrasound?


The definition of rape in most states is "the insertion of an object into an orifice against a persons will." That's what is happening here.
Rape is an act of violence and power that degrades and demeans women who often are ashamed at being raped.
So yes since that is what invasive transvaginal ultrasounds are, this is an attempt to shame women. As was the scarlet letter law in Florida that Bush supported, as are the demonstrations in front of abortion clinics by anti-abortionists.
The thing is, making abortions illegal doesn't stop them happening. 100 years of history in the US proved that. Attempts at publicly shaming women won't be any more effective. It just forces women to underground clinics etc.

fate
Are you sure you want to use that link?

Since the point I was trying to support was that abortion has all kinds of psychological problems, yes. Since the article makes this point with much evidence.
And apparently, coming from the Christian source, won't be dismissed by an ad hominem by you as you did the well research Rolling Stone piece.