Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 10 Jul 2012, 11:45 am

Purple wrote:Most of Africa, most of non-Islamic Asia except China and Japan, and most of South America were all subject to colonialism, have all suffered poverty and poor education, and dictators. Differences? A thousand. And wars are certainly not unknown in these places.
Certainly they are not. Congo being a prime example of a place where war is rampant, the status of women is incredibly low and Islam is not really a factor (the country being 96% Christian). I can think of a few other countries in Africa outside the Islamic sphere that are hardly paragons.

Parts of (non-Islamic) Asia are similar, and funnily enough those parts most in deprivation are also the ones with a lot more problems. Nepal, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Vietnam have all had very violent civil wars within living memory. Less said about North Korea the better. Even India outside the areas where there's tension with Muslims, there's problems like the Naxalites, the Sikh-Hindu issues, a pretty poor history of human rights (and women's rights) in many places. Lynching for consorting outside caste boundaries in some strict Hindu areas will see a similar response to that to adultery in the less enlightened parts of the Islamic world.

South America I would say is different. It broke away from it's colonial masters before much of Africa and Asia was even fully subdued, and so has had an extra 100 years or so of republican government (albeit not always democratic or liberal). Still, there's been a long running political faultline through the continent that has flared up into quite nasty violence within living memory, too.

Next you'll ask for a detailed statistical breakout. (At least I would!) :laugh:
I'm not going to take the time, so you may consider the point conceded.
Nope, I just wanted to see what you meant.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 11 Jul 2012, 7:17 am

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 13,00.html

Summer fun – Narrow hallways, interrogation rooms painted black, isolation cells and handcuffed mannequins – this is all part of the setting of a new summer camp operated by Hamas in the Gaza Strip. ...

Hytham al- Madhun, one of the camp guides, explained that the mock prison set up for the camp is divided into six rooms, each simulating the incarceration conditions of Palestinian prisoners. The first room is an interrogation cell, which is where prisoners are first led once entering the prison. In this room, Madhun describes to the kids "the prisoners' firm resilience in the face of Israeli interrogators' threats and their refusal to admit the charges ascribed to them."

One of the main heroes of the camp is Ibrahim Hamed, who was the head of Hamas' military wing in Ramallah and is responsible for murdering dozens of Israelis. The guides boastfully tell the children how Hamed, who was recently sentenced to 54 life sentences, has continually refused to give his interrogators any information, including his given name.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 11 Jul 2012, 7:34 am

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 88,00.html

Gaza kindergartners want to 'blow up Zionists'

The children were dressed up in uniforms of Jihad's armed-wing, the al-Quds Brigades, and each of them received a toy rifle. Some of them held up photos of Islamic Jihad founder Fathi Shaqaqi. ...

During the ceremony the children were asked to stand next to mock coffins draped with flags of the various armed factions. The flags bore the images of "shahids (martyrs)." ...

One child, Hamza, said "When I grow up I'll join Islamic Jihad and the al-Quds Brigades. I'll fight the Zionist enemy and fire missiles at it until I die as a shahid and join my father in heaven.

"I love the resistance and the martyrs and Palestine, and I want to blow myself up on Zionists and kill them on a bus in a suicide bombing," he said.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 11 Jul 2012, 11:09 am

Ray Jay wrote:http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4254113,00.html
reminds me of a tour I took of Kilmainham Jail in Dublin. Lots of Americans and Irish were eager to see the places where Irish republicans were incarcerated and executed, but not so keen to delve into what it was they'd exactly done before the evil Brits put them in prison and mistreated them.

Sometimes not-forgetting can involve a fair amount of forgetfulness...

Now, how much of this is 'Islamic' and how much is about a national or tribal response to perceived oppression? If you want a comparator in modern times, I'd point you at the Tamils of Sri Lanka. Incredibly bitter and they usually lose. Nasty terrorism from the LTTE and a regarding of those Tigers as heroes.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 5:17 am

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 16,00.html

In case you missed this.

Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood said on its website that the attack on a police station in Sinai on Sunday in which 16 policemen were killed "can be attributed to Mossad" and was an attempt to thwart Islamist President Mohamed Morsi's new regime.

The statement claimed that the Israeli intelligence agency was trying to hinder the Egyptian uprising that toppled president Hosni Mubarak in 2011 and that it was "imperative to review clauses" of the 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and Israel.


This struck me as important because it repeats an old pattern. The new President of Egypt is blaming Israel for a recent terrorist attack. There's no evidence that points to Israel, but it is suits his political purposes. Already he is lying to his people, who are too eager to believe his lies. I think it is part of the culture's pathos that if something goes wrong, it must be someone else's fault. Without self examination, there cannot be self improvement.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 5:21 am

Danivon:
Now, how much of this is 'Islamic' and how much is about a national or tribal response to perceived oppression?


My own take (bias?) is that much of it is Islamic, or at least in the Arab world it is an Arab cultural response. I don't know how you figure that out, but would be open to a study that tries to answer your question.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 6:43 am

ray
The new President of Egypt is blaming Israel for a recent terrorist attack. There's no evidence that points to Israel, but it is suits his political purpose


Where is is quoted as saying this? Your quotation says the Mulim Brotherhood website. That could be down to some junior functionary with access to the web site.
Israel has always served as a great distraction for The Egyptian government.
The Egyptian government is essentially a military dictatorship with a veneer of democracy.
If militants are attacking border posts, its unlikely that the military see this as anything but a direct challenge by Hamas or Hezbollah or Al Queda. (Depending on who is responsible and since the early reports say the attackers included infiltrators from Gaza... )
They'll want the focus on the real threat not the usual bogey man.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 7:06 am

rickyp wrote:ray
The new President of Egypt is blaming Israel for a recent terrorist attack. There's no evidence that points to Israel, but it is suits his political purpose


Where is is quoted as saying this? Your quotation says the Mulim Brotherhood website. That could be down to some junior functionary with access to the web site.
Israel has always served as a great distraction for The Egyptian government.
The Egyptian government is essentially a military dictatorship with a veneer of democracy.
If militants are attacking border posts, its unlikely that the military see this as anything but a direct challenge by Hamas or Hezbollah or Al Queda. (Depending on who is responsible and since the early reports say the attackers included infiltrators from Gaza... )
They'll want the focus on the real threat not the usual bogey man.


I wasn't talking about the military dictatorship; I was talking about the popularly elected President. (That's the Arab/Islamic cultural theme.) That being said, I overstated my case. Morsi is not the head of the Muslim Brotherhood, just one of its leaders. However, this does prove that he is in bed politically with people who are either liars or delusional. He hasn't contradicted them, probably because he doesn't have the politcal power to do so.

I find your explanation that this was done by some "junior functionary" to be unbelievable. Describing the murder of 16 Egyptian policemen on an official website would have to come from the top of any politcal organization. Don't you see that it is coming from a "junior functionary" as an absurd notion? Do you really think that the world works that way?
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 8:29 am

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/ ... TE=DEFAULT
The military has said that 35 gunmen attacked an Egyptian border post, killing the 16 before commandeering an armored vehicle they later used to try to storm across the border into Israel. It has accused Palestinians from Gaza of aiding the gunmen, by firing mortar shells at a nearby border cross just as the gunmen were attacking.

The killers are believed to be part of a low-level Islamist insurgency that has been active in Sinai for a decade, and which is allied with al-Qaida-inspired groups of militants in both Gaza and Sinai.


The military rules Egypt.. Not the Muslim Brotherhood.
As for who writes the copy for the Muslim Brotherhood website? Its entirely plausible its just some hot head web master... Lets wait to see..
What you are jumping on is akin to Fox News blaming Muslim terrorists for the latest mass shooting in the US, without checking . (Or maybe more specifically the RNC official web ste.) Its no official well sprung of policy or positions for the Egyptian government.


ray
However, this does prove that he is in bed politically with people who are either liars or delusional.

Of what politician in what country cannot this be statement be made?

ray
He hasn't contradicted them, probably because he doesn't have the political power to do so.

The army will tell him what to say. And they are blaming al-Qaida wannabees.

The situation in Egypt follows the age old model of a ruling elite giving up power incrementally in order to keep most of their remaining power. What the military fears is a complete break down which would threaten their favored positions in Egypt. The al-Qaida group are a threat to stability but actually may play into their hands, in order to stop public opinion from forcing more change to the status quo. (You need the strong hand of the military etc...)
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 8:47 am

Ricky:
As for who writes the copy for the Muslim Brotherhood website? Its entirely plausible its just some hot head web master... Lets wait to see..
What you are jumping on is akin to Fox News blaming Muslim terrorists for the latest mass shooting in the US, without checking .


Really? Saying that the Muslim Brotherhood is responsible for its own website is akin to blaming Muslim Terrorists for a neo-Nazi killing Sikhs? I just don't get where you are coming from. Can someone else help here?

ray

He hasn't contradicted them, probably because he doesn't have the political power to do so.


The army will tell him what to say.


I don't think that's right. Morsi is not in the pocket of the military. He is in a power struggle against them. Yes, they have the ultimate power, but they don't tell him what to say. He is saying plenty of stuff that they don't agree with. He is not even openly contradicting the Muslim Brotherhood who claims that Mossad did this.

I think this quote from the article that you referenced describes it pretty well.

Morsi has sought to reverse ousted leader Hosni Mubarak's hardline policy toward Hamas, promising to ease the hardship endured by Gaza's 1.6 million residents as a result of years of siege by Mubarak's Egypt and his Israeli allies.

He has promised to open the Rafah border crossing - Gazans' only gateway to the outside world - round the clock and allow goods to move to and out of the coastal territory. With their shared enmity for Israel, Morsi and Gaza's rulers had appeared ready to strike an enduring alliance that could only have alarmed many in an Israel already concerned by the rise of Islamists in Egypt.

But Sunday's attack and the Egyptian military's assertion of Palestinian involvement may already have undermined that prospect. If Morsi maintains close ties with Hamas now, he could come under criticism for prioritizing the Brotherhood's agenda over the nation's interests.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 10:29 am

Ray Jay wrote:Danivon:
Now, how much of this is 'Islamic' and how much is about a national or tribal response to perceived oppression?


My own take (bias?) is that much of it is Islamic, or at least in the Arab world it is an Arab cultural response. I don't know how you figure that out, but would be open to a study that tries to answer your question.
of course 'Arab' and 'Islamic' are not the same thing. Quite a few Arabs are not Muslim, particularly in Palestine and Lebanon. Also, Arab culture predates Islam. To be honest, I think a lot of Islam is influenced by Arabic culture (as much as it would have been by the Jewish and Christian sects that were present around the area), so I think it would be hard to distinguish between the two.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 12:23 pm

ray
Really? Saying that the Muslim Brotherhood is responsible for its own website is akin to blaming Muslim Terrorists for a neo-Nazi killing Sikhs? I just don't get where you are coming from. Can someone else help here?


Let me help. You are saying that the MB website represents Morsi's position. NO?
If the RNC web site published something about the latest mass shooting being a Muslim terrorist would you immediately assume that was Mitt Romneys position?
If the RNC came out later and changed the web site, would you accept it if they said it was published without authorization?
I grant you may be right about the MB upper echelon jumped the gun on the web site from up high. But I'll bet they walk it back as facts take hold. (Al Queda)
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 3239
Joined: 29 Jan 2003, 9:54 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm

Oh I wish I could afford to take this bet. There is no way the Muslim Brotherhood will walk that back.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 12:37 pm

Ricky:
Let me help. You are saying that the MB website represents Morsi's position. NO?


NO. What I have said is:

However, this does prove that he is in bed politically with people who are either liars or delusional. He hasn't contradicted them, probably because he doesn't have the politcal power to do so.


and

He is not even openly contradicting the Muslim Brotherhood who claims that Mossad did this.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 07 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm

Until Morsi contradicts his own organisation, we can't assume he doesn't agree. Another example of the null hypothesis.