Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 8:53 am

freeman
Ricky, imagine what would happen if Israel did not occupy the West Bank and control Gaza? What would be the result? Based on the past 66 years a large increase in terrorist attacks against Israelis would happen

It isn't one sided. Its two sided... Palestinians have their historic fear of treatment by Israel, either in the form of terrorism or in the form of brutal military action ...Here's how some have expressed that view...

The record of Israeli terrorism goes back to the origins of the state—indeed, long before—including the massacre of 250 civilians and brutal expulsion of seventy thousand others from Lydda and Ramle in July 1948; the massacre of hundreds of others at the undefended village of Doueimah near Hebron in October 1948;...the slaughters in Quibya, Kafr Kassem, and a string of other assassinated villages; the expulsion of thousands of Bedouins from the demilitarized zones shortly after the 1948 war and thousands more from northeastern Sinai in the early 1970's, their villages destroyed, to open the region for Jewish settlement; and on, and on." Noam Chomsky, "Blaming The Victims," ed. Said and Hitchen
s.

It is simply extraordinary and without precedent that Israel's history, its record—from the fact that it...is a state built on conquest, that it has invaded surrounding countries, bombed and destroyed at will, to the fact that it currently occupies Lebanese, Syrian, and Palestinian territory against international law—is simply never cited, never subjected to scrutiny in the U.S. media or in official discourse...never addressed as playing any role at all in provoking 'Islamic terror.'"Edward Said in "The Progressive." May 30, 1996.

http://www.wrmea.com/special-topics/366 ... egion.html

freeman3
So some sort of Israeli control of the West Bank and Gaza is necessary for Israel 's security

There has been "some sort of control" for a long time. From complete occupation to the current hodge podge of "security zones" in the West Bankl and the ghettoization of Gaza today.
It hasn't stopped the terror, nor has the "heavy handed" occupation done anything but create resentment from the constant humiliations that Palestinians endure.
It isn't an asnwer.
The answer is the development of a Palestinian nation willing to live in peace side by side with Israel. Israel doesn't want that. It wants to annex more and more of the West Bank and extract its resources.
If it did actually work to help create the institutions that Palestine needs, to help create the infrastructure that Palestine needs, it could work towards creating a genuine neighbor.
Israel currently has no real interest in attaining a lasting peace, if it interferes with its goals of annexing territory and resources...
Look, Hamas are mad men. But if you consider the conditions that Gazans endure , who wouldn't become more extreme . All that the recent conflict has done is create more martyrs and harden attitudes. In 4 or 5 years, it'll happen all over again. Maybe less time... All those unemployed Gazans have time on their hands to redig tunnels and build more rockets...
The situation won't change until the West has a more sympathetic view of the plight of Palestinians... And the media sure isn't balanced in the west on that.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 9:05 am

ray
Long and deep tunnels (to the Israeli side with only one purpose: terror)


The tunnels main use and its original use is smuggling

Tunneling is said to have begun in the early 1980s when the border was reestablished after Israel withdrew from Sinai. Initially, the tunnels were used for moving consumer goods and drugs. During the First Intifada (December 1987 to 1993), they became conduits for weapons and militants
.
The blockade of the Gaza Strip has caused a shortage of certain basic products, especially construction materials, fuel, some consumer articles, and medicines and medical supplies.[7][8] Import restrictions, including of basic building materials, have led to the proliferation of tunnels under the border with Egypt.[9][10] As Israel limits the Palestinian freedom of movement, for most Gazans the tunnels are the only way to move from and to Gaza.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_Strip ... ng_tunnels
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7463
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 07 Aug 2014, 9:09 am

rickyp wrote:bbauska
Perhaps they should produce their own

How does one "produce" water?
It is a natural resource... Its either there or its not...
but if you actually want to try and understand the problem with water in the Palestinian territories
here:

Water supply and sanitation in the Palestinian territories are characterized by severe water shortage and are highly influenced by the Israeli occupation. The water resources of Palestine are fully controlled by Israel and the division of groundwater is subject to provisions in the Oslo II Accord.
Generally, the water quality is considerably worse in the Gaza strip when compared to the West Bank. About a third to half of the delivered water in the Palestinian territories is lost in the distribution network. The lasting blockade of the Gaza Strip and the Gaza War have caused severe damage to the infrastructure in the Gaza Strip.[8][9] Concerning wastewater, the existing treatment plants do not have the capacity to treat all of the produced wastewater, causing severe water pollution.[7] The development of the sector highly depends on external financing.[5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supp ... erritories

or http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinio ... 46684.html

bbauska
Do you think the Gazans are within their rights to fire rockets at Israel because the "feel" occupied?

Were the indigenous people of North America within their rights to resist the White Man?
Are the Kurds within their rights to resist the occupation of Mosul by Isis?
Were Iraqis within their rights to resist the occupation of Iraq by the US?
Was the french resistance in WWII within its rights when it sabotaged and assassinated German officers?
Was Irgun within its rights when it bomberd the JKing David Hotel?

I expect your view of the above varies according to your personal perspective...
I don't know personnally if Gazans are "within their rights". but I can understand why their constant frustrations find them supporting the rocketing... Can you?


Desalinization plants.

Concerning all your list of resistance...
Yes, they can resist. The people they are resisting against have the right to defend themselves as well.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 123
Joined: 02 Jun 2012, 9:41 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 9:30 am

Of course Israelis have a right to defend themselves and their security. But I would argue that non-violent Palestinians have a right to their homeland as well.

The fault for the whole situation really lies with the Western powers who carved up the Middle East (and Africa) with little regard for tribal/racial/linguistic borders that would have been much more sensible.

At the end of WWII, Jews had gone through thousands of years of persecution, culminating in one of the most terrible atrocities the world has ever seen. It is understandable that the powers who won the war and liberated the concentration camps would want to finally give the Jewish people what they wanted: Zion. But what of the people already living there? Was it fair to them?

Any Israeli born there since the creation of the state has just as much right to defend their homeland as we Americans would. But how is Gaza not the world's largest prison? Of course it's to a lesser degree than the Warsaw ghetto; it is much less dense and not the same kind of mass extermination.

I apologize if I offended you, Ray, but I would be surprised if you don't see this situation as state-sponsored Israeli persecution of others. Don't you think that Jews, of all people, would have learned that lesson by now, having been on the wrong end of it for so many generations?
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 10:27 am

rickyp wrote:ray
Long and deep tunnels (to the Israeli side with only one purpose: terror)


The tunnels main use and its original use is smuggling

Tunneling is said to have begun in the early 1980s when the border was reestablished after Israel withdrew from Sinai. Initially, the tunnels were used for moving consumer goods and drugs. During the First Intifada (December 1987 to 1993), they became conduits for weapons and militants
.
The blockade of the Gaza Strip has caused a shortage of certain basic products, especially construction materials, fuel, some consumer articles, and medicines and medical supplies.[7][8] Import restrictions, including of basic building materials, have led to the proliferation of tunnels under the border with Egypt.[9][10] As Israel limits the Palestinian freedom of movement, for most Gazans the tunnels are the only way to move from and to Gaza.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_Strip ... ng_tunnels


Yes, yes, everyone knows that. if you had read my post more carefully you would realize that your post doesn't make sense. The tunnels from Gaza to Israel do not have a commercial purpose.

Yes they need tunnels for "construction materials" and "basic building materials". They need to build big and deep tunnels to Israel. They also need to smuggle rockets in from Iran.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 10:30 am

freeman3 wrote:Here is an article that gives possible explanations as to why the civilian casualties are so high.http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/j ... ng-experts
This article about the casualties seems well-balanced.
http://www.vox.com/2014/7/30/5937119/pa ... aza-israel

When you start talking about 300 dead Palestinian children...I think Israel needs to reassess its tactics.


These are good articles. Thanks. Regarding the VOX article, I think this is a key part:

It may well be the case that sometimes Israel is forced into an impossible choice between ignoring rocket attacks and bombing a civilian structure, in which it is at least defensible for Israel to privilege its self-defense and bomb the building. But in a larger view it is very difficult to imagine that a Palestinian threat that has killed seven Israeli civilians is dire enough to justify attacks that have killed 815 Palestinian civilians.


No surprise, I fully agree with the first sentence. Regarding the 2nd sentence, I don't agree. I think the author is not thinking critically in their attempt to be even-handed. Let's look at historical analogies.

How many UK and US civilians were saved when the UK and the US decided to firebomb German cities at the end of WWII. I would guess a lower ratio than in this recent war. The reality is that the U.S. and the UK were firebombing German cities to save their military and to accelerate the end of the war. They knew they would win the war at that point. They were minimizing their military casualties at the expense of German civilians.

The same applies to the firebombing of Tokyo. And how about Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The US had no civilians at risk at that time. We willingly killed hundreds of thousands of civilians to protect our military. If you are condemning Israel now then you should be condemning the UK and the US activity towards the end of WWII to a much greater extent.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 10:44 am

Shrizzz:
But I would argue that non-violent Palestinians have a right to their homeland as well.


Yes, the West Bank is different. But Gaza is not ruled by non-violent Palestinians.

Shrizzz:
I apologize if I offended you, Ray, but I would be surprised if you don't see this situation as state-sponsored Israeli persecution of others. Don't you think that Jews, of all people, would have learned that lesson by now, having been on the wrong end of it for so many generations?


As it relates to Gaza I don't see it as state sponsored persecution. I see it as a nation state trying to defend its people from rockets and terror. It is war it sucks.

I think different Jews have learned different lessons. I also think that like most people Jews can share conflicting views. One can sympathies with Palestinians and want to protect one's people. Modern science suggests that our brain is a sort of democracy where we funnel conflicting views until the right answer is clear to us. Some of us are consistently on one side of things, but many of us (like me) spend a lot of time 55/45 and tend to see both sides. That's why there are swing voters in elections.

But I digress; I think most American Jews, and particularly younger American Jews tend to have a lot of empathy for anyone who is suffering and tend to blame whoever appears to be the aggressor. That's certainly one lesson of our tragic history. When you have it all -- which we really do from most perspectives -- that makes sense.

But an equally valid lesson, which is one shared by most Israelis, is that you have to fight for yourself because no one else will reliably do that for you. This is more than just the tragic history culminating in the Holocaust. It's also a reflection of Arabs attacking Jews and Israelis since the 1920's.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 11:05 am

"But an equally valid lesson, which is one shared by most Gazans, is that you have to fight for yourself because no one else will reliably do that for you."
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 11:14 am

Regarding density and Gaza, here are some interesting stats:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_density

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ci ... on_density

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Eu ... on_density

So, Gaza is less dense than Hong Kong and Singapore. It is 1/4th as dense as Paris which last time I visited is quite nice. It is 1/4 as dense as Athens and Cairo, and it is 1/2 as dense as Moscow or Naples. It is less dense than London which is also a very nice place to be, and not at all built up. Gaza is about as dense as Wash D.C. which is filled with public space.

There is a bit of apples and oranges here, so let's just look at Gaza City which is its largest city. GC's density is about 10,000 people per sq km. This means it is not even in the top 50 of world cities.

By the way, the density of Gaza as of late is being driven by its birth rate. In the year 2004, about when the Israelis disengaged it was 1.3 million. It is now 1.8 million. That's not Israel's fault. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographi ... erritories

I know, it's crowded. But based on the actual numbers there's a lot of hyperbole going on.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 11:15 am

rickyp wrote:"But an equally valid lesson, which is one shared by most Gazans, is that you have to fight for yourself because no one else will reliably do that for you."


The Gazans are not fighting for themselves.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 11:26 am

ray
The tunnels from Gaza to Israel do not have a commercial purpose
.

Whats your source for that claim?
Here's a Palestinian source with a view on the tunnels I bet you don't hear too often
Maybe it help explains why i think that Israel is solving nothing...
To Israel, every tunnel — be it one that brings food into an impoverished Gaza Strip where over half of the population depends on food aid or one that delivers sheep to a Khan Younis farmer who lost his other farm animals to a prior Israeli incursion — is a “terror tunnel”. The phrase alone has given Israel the impunity it feels it needs to enact vengeance against the Gaza’s population. After all, “terror tunnels” was the pretext for Israel’s repeated bombardment of the Shuja’iyya neighborhood or the Jabalya Refugee Camp, where hundreds including many children were massacred and thousands displaced.
“Terror tunnels” is also why entire city blocks were wiped off the map, or why every single building in Beit Hanoun is either damaged or demolished, or why Eid Al-Fitr wasn’t celebrated in Gaza. “Terror tunnels” is Israel’s attempt at justifying war crimes and human rights abuses in the Strip, which are increasingly being investigated by the United Nations and other international observers.
Israel’s media strategists and spokespeople have been trained to bring up the “terror tunnels” as often as possible. In some cases, they even present the tunnels with unsubstantiated claims that they were built to ‘massacre’ Israelis.
The message they give is that Palestinians are popping out of the ground like groundhogs, and that Israel is simply hammering them back into the ground. Israel is, in essence, basing its invasion of the Gaza Strip on a hypothetical. But Gaza is all too familiar with this. Each Israeli major military offensive on the Gaza Strip has been announced as a necessary defensive maneuver to keep Israel from being wiped off of the map. Meanwhile, Israel wipes Gaza off the map.
Incidentally, one such “terror tunnel” made its way onto cameras yesterday when Hamas fighters filmed their infiltration of the Nahal Oz military base in southern Israel. Five Israeli soldiers were reported killed.
In another “terror tunnel” story that happened today, three Israeli soldiers fell into a booby-trapped tunnel entrance in the southern Gaza Strip.
While the Israeli government continues to purport the idea that the tunnels are meant to target thousands of Israelis, we are left with the very obvious: every single military assault carried out by Palestinian fighters that has used an infiltrating tunnel has only ever targeted Israeli soldiers. In other words, armed tunnel activity is targeting armed and active combatants, not civilians or noncombatants. Maybe Israel can learn a thing or two.
Meanwhile, the death toll in Gaza has just exceeded 1,300. Most of the dead, according to the United Nations, are civilians, with over 250 children.
Israel, who says that it acts solely in self-defense, is enacting on Gaza the kind of destruction and misery that it projects to the world as its greatest fear.
Israel, whose spokespeople say it acts “as surgically as is humanly possible,” has no regard for civilians in the Gaza Strip.
Israel, with its seemingly endless supply of advanced and pinpoint-accurate weaponry, has demolished entire neighborhoods and taken so many lives in search of tunnel entrances no larger than two meters in width.

http://smpalestine.com/2014/07/30/a-thi ... r-tunnels/
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 11:31 am

ray
The Gazans are not fighting for themselves

Who then?

When i read stuff directly, from Gaza I get this...Sounds like they are fighting for themselves...

Sameh, a prominent political analyst in Gaza, told The Times of Israel Wednesday.
But the quiet, he said, is deceptive. “It’s not over yet. Hamas is under a lot of pressure to return to fighting if Egypt and Israel don’t allow the blockade to be lifted,” Sameh said.
The residents of the Gaza Strip are torn between wanting the fighting to go on and wanting it to stop, he added.
“Those who have lost their children and relatives actually want the fighting to continue. So do those whose houses were destroyed,” he said. “They don’t have anything to lose anymore, and they are pressuring [Hamas] not to stop now unless the blockade is lifted completely. On the other hand, those whose houses are still standing want it to end.”
Sameh added, “You are sorely mistaken if you think it’s over. Have you seen any of the Hamas top brass leave the bunkers? From the political or the military wing? Yesterday, they said in no uncertain terms: We’re in the middle stage, not at the end of the war. And they are already preparing for the renewal of the clashes. They can’t stop now without a significant achievement in Cairo.”


Read more: Gazans who have lost everything want Hamas to resume fighting | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/gazans-who ... z39jTcDIOx
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 11:34 am

rickyp wrote:ray
The tunnels from Gaza to Israel do not have a commercial purpose
.

Whats your source for that claim?
Here's a Palestinian source with a view on the tunnels I bet you don't hear too often
Maybe it help explains why i think that Israel is solving nothing...
To Israel, every tunnel — be it one that brings food into an impoverished Gaza Strip where over half of the population depends on food aid or one that delivers sheep to a Khan Younis farmer who lost his other farm animals to a prior Israeli incursion — is a “terror tunnel”. The phrase alone has given Israel the impunity it feels it needs to enact vengeance against the Gaza’s population. After all, “terror tunnels” was the pretext for Israel’s repeated bombardment of the Shuja’iyya neighborhood or the Jabalya Refugee Camp, where hundreds including many children were massacred and thousands displaced.
“Terror tunnels” is also why entire city blocks were wiped off the map, or why every single building in Beit Hanoun is either damaged or demolished, or why Eid Al-Fitr wasn’t celebrated in Gaza. “Terror tunnels” is Israel’s attempt at justifying war crimes and human rights abuses in the Strip, which are increasingly being investigated by the United Nations and other international observers.
Israel’s media strategists and spokespeople have been trained to bring up the “terror tunnels” as often as possible. In some cases, they even present the tunnels with unsubstantiated claims that they were built to ‘massacre’ Israelis.
The message they give is that Palestinians are popping out of the ground like groundhogs, and that Israel is simply hammering them back into the ground. Israel is, in essence, basing its invasion of the Gaza Strip on a hypothetical. But Gaza is all too familiar with this. Each Israeli major military offensive on the Gaza Strip has been announced as a necessary defensive maneuver to keep Israel from being wiped off of the map. Meanwhile, Israel wipes Gaza off the map.
Incidentally, one such “terror tunnel” made its way onto cameras yesterday when Hamas fighters filmed their infiltration of the Nahal Oz military base in southern Israel. Five Israeli soldiers were reported killed.
In another “terror tunnel” story that happened today, three Israeli soldiers fell into a booby-trapped tunnel entrance in the southern Gaza Strip.
While the Israeli government continues to purport the idea that the tunnels are meant to target thousands of Israelis, we are left with the very obvious: every single military assault carried out by Palestinian fighters that has used an infiltrating tunnel has only ever targeted Israeli soldiers. In other words, armed tunnel activity is targeting armed and active combatants, not civilians or noncombatants. Maybe Israel can learn a thing or two.
Meanwhile, the death toll in Gaza has just exceeded 1,300. Most of the dead, according to the United Nations, are civilians, with over 250 children.
Israel, who says that it acts solely in self-defense, is enacting on Gaza the kind of destruction and misery that it projects to the world as its greatest fear.
Israel, whose spokespeople say it acts “as surgically as is humanly possible,” has no regard for civilians in the Gaza Strip.
Israel, with its seemingly endless supply of advanced and pinpoint-accurate weaponry, has demolished entire neighborhoods and taken so many lives in search of tunnel entrances no larger than two meters in width.

http://smpalestine.com/2014/07/30/a-thi ... r-tunnels/


Ricky, I'm talking about the tunnels from Gaza to Israel while you are talking about tunnels between Gaza and Egypt. Please read more carefully.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 07 Aug 2014, 11:40 am

rickyp wrote:ray
The Gazans are not fighting for themselves

Who then?

When i read stuff directly, from Gaza I get this...Sounds like they are fighting for themselves...



I don't know; perhaps they are fighting for an elite who wants to retain their power and the support of their Iranian sponsors. Perhaps they are nihilists who are expressing their hatred. Perhaps they have convinced themselves that Israel will disappear if they fire a few more rockets. Bin Laden thought that the U.S. and west would crumble after 9/11. They don't understand the west's power and willingness to survive. And they certainly have no conception about Israel's desire and ability to never be forced to leave again.

I don't know what they are fighting for, but it certainly isn't for themselves.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3741
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 07 Aug 2014, 12:22 pm

I don't think I am condemning Israel or asking that there be consequences for what happened. But there does seem to be grounds to think that the civilian casualties are higher than they need to be (even given the difficult conditions they are operating under) and, if that is so, shouldn't Israel take a look at what it is doing to see if it can't do better? Maybe they will find that they will take too many casualties if they change tactics, but apart from the humanitarian concerns involved there is also the PR battle and that is not irrelevant to national security.
I do agree with your point about the massive differential of casualties--it doesn't matter that only 7 Israeli citizens had been killed, Israel has the right to make sure that missiles don't get shot repeatedly into Israel , having an effect on peace of mind and nerves far in excess of casualties sustained. If it takes a lot of Palestinian casualties to stop that...well,maybe the Palestinians should do something to stop Hamas from shooting missiles into Israel.