Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 6:08 am

danivon wrote:
Ray Jay wrote:I think that is all fair, but I don't think you can ignore the fact that the U.K. has a growing Muslim population. It's perfectly normal to feel kinship for those with whom you have a common faith. How can that not influence how you perceive the conflict?
I guess it probably does - not having a faith it's not something that sways me much. Of course, there are Christian Arabs and Palestinians who oppose Israel's occupation and are active in the PLO/Fatah/PA, but that does not seem to motivate many Christians in the West.


In the U.S. most Christians have noticed that in the Middle East the only country that is safe for Christians is Israel. There is only one country in the Middle East that has a growing Christian population, which should tell you something. In fact, many Palestinian Christians, having observed what happens to Christians in Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, etc., have noticed that their safest bet is to stay in Israel. Palestinian Christians are even volunteering to join the Israeli Defense Forces. They also suffer violence from Palestinian Muslims when they don't tow the party line.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 6:48 am

ray
In the U.S. most Christians have noticed that in the Middle East the only country that is safe for Christians is Israel


Up until the invasion of 2003 Iraq had a thriving and protected Christian community. And although there has been some persecution of Copt Christians in Egypt theirs has been a lasting society within Egypt.
I think it can be argued that not only in Iraq, but in much of the Middle East the invasion of Iraq set off the inter religious conflicts that, excepting the Iran Iraq war, and the Lebanese civil war, had been largely in check. Certainly the shiite sunni conflicts had not been fought on a large scale for many years, until the 1980's. It is true that whenever there is a power struggle in Muslim countries, the ancient schism is used by the competing powers to ratchet up tension and hatred.
Religious differences become a tool for provocation but aren't the cause of conflict.

I'm not sure how important your observation about migrating Christian to Israel is either...
Many of the recent Christians moving to Israel are relatives of Russian jews, moving with the mixed marriage families. A few are Marronite exiles from Lebanon. But there hasn't been a surge from other parts of the Middle East largely because there are few Christian, outside of Egyptian Copts and Lebanese sects, in the Middle East.
In total Christians are 2.1% of the total population of Israel. And they are divided between 9 or 10 sects.
And I think we know that if there were a sudden influx of large populations of anything but Jews into Israel that the Israelis government wouldn't respond favorably. I mean if 3 or 4 million Arabs living in Israel or the occupied territories suddenly petitioned for full citizenship in Israel that they would not be entertained.
The whole point of Israel is to keep it as a Jewish state. Religious freedom may be a point of law, but only until the demographics threaten the nature of the State. Then we see what religious freedom means... For now religious freedom is a worthwhile public relations point.
Its really not that different from many Muslim states that in the past have tolerated small religious minorities. But if they become too influential .... things change.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 7:29 am

I didn't say anything about waves of Christians migrating to Israel. I just said that they are safe there and their population is growing (and not only by migration) whereas in Arab countries their lives are in jeopardy as they are discriminated against and sometimes killed for no reason at all. If you need to pretend that the treatment of Christians in Iraq is similar to their treatment in Israel because it conforms to your ideology, go ahead.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 8:39 am

There is a difference between the experience of Christian Arabs in Israel proper, and those living in the Occupied territories.

And there are some Christians not too happy about their treatment by Jews in Israel and Palestine - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religio ... anity.html

And from wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinia ... emigration

In a 2006 poll of Christians in Bethlehem by the Palestinian Centre for Research and Cultural Dialogue, 90% reported having Muslim friends, 73.3% agreed that the Palestinian Authority treats Christian heritage in the city with respect and 78% attributed the ongoing exodus of Christians from Bethlehem to the Israeli occupation and travel restrictions on the area.


There's also a US State Dept report cited that describes Muslim-Christian relations as good, in contrast to being "strained" between Jews and non-Jews.

Clearly Israel is better than ISIS, Saudi Arabia or Iran. But that is not the ideal comparator for a western style democracy.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 9:19 am

ray
If you need to pretend that the treatment of Christians in Iraq is similar to their treatment in Israel because it conforms to your ideology, go ahead.

what ideology would that be?
What I said Ray, was that
Up until the invasion of 2003, Iraq had a thriving and protected Christian community.And thats true.

In Iraq, Christians numbered about 1,500,000 in 2003, representing just over 5% of the population of the country. They numbered over 1.4 million in 1987 or 8% of the population.[1] After the Iraq War, it was estimated that the number of Christians in Iraq had dropped to less than 450,000 by 2013[2] - with estimates as low as 200,000.[3] Chaldean Catholics form the biggest group among the Christians of Iraq.[


Israel, is not a western democracy in the same way that most western nations are.
Israel is a Jewish State. It does guarantee religious freedom, but if the nature of the Jewish State were threatened demographically how long would those religious freedoms persist?
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 10:01 am

Guys, you are welcome to make any tangential points that you like, whether they are accurate or not, but I'm responding to this point that Danivon made:
Of course, there are Christian Arabs and Palestinians who oppose Israel's occupation and are active in the PLO/Fatah/PA, but that does not seem to motivate many Christians in the West.


And my point is that most Christians in the West see the broader picture of the Mideast conflict and do not support the Palestinians because some of them are Christians. If anything it is the opposite. If you have strong Christian affinities, you will recognize that Christians do much better in Israel than elsewhere in the Middle East so. your opinion on the conflict will be more supportive of Israel, not less.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 10:10 am

Ricky:
Israel, is not a western democracy in the same way that most western nations are.
Israel is a Jewish State. It does guarantee religious freedom, but if the nature of the Jewish State were threatened demographically how long would those religious freedoms persist?


Yes, but so what. Christians women would have to have 25 babies each to have a majority in Israel in this century. If you are talking about emigration, Israel is no different than Canada. If Canada had an influx of 40 million people of a different ethnic group I'm sure your government would react too.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 10:17 am

Ricky said:

Up until the invasion of 2003, Iraq had a thriving and protected Christian community.


Wikipedia says:

In 1987, the last Iraqi census counted 1.4 million Christians.[10] They were tolerated under the secular regime of Saddam Hussein, who even made one of them, Tariq Aziz his deputy. However persecution by Saddam Hussein continued against the Christians on an ethnic, cultural and racial level, as the vast majority are Mesopotamian Aramaic speaking Ethnic Assyrians (a.k.a. Chaldo-Assyrians). The Assyrian -Aramaic language and written script was repressed, the giving of Syriac Christian names or Akkadian/Assyro-Babylonian names forbidden (Tariq Aziz real name is Mikhail Yuhanna, for example), and Saddam exploited religious differences between Assyrian denominations such as the Chaldean Church, Assyrian Church of the East, Orthodox and the Ancient Church of the East. Over 2,000 Assyrians were ethnically cleansed from their towns and villages under the al Anfal Campaign of 1988.

Prior to the Gulf War in 1991, Christians numbered one million in Iraq.[5] The Baathist rule under Saddam Hussein kept anti-Christian violence under control but subjected some to "relocation programmes".[5] Under this regime, the predominantly ethnically and linguistically distinct Assyrians were pressured to identify as Arabs.


If you consider ethnic cleansing, forced name changes, relocation programs, and language repression as "protection" then Ricky is correct.

Yes, it did get worse after 2003, but please be real.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 10:32 am

Treatment of Christians in Gaza per Wikipedia:

In 2007, about 3,000 Gazans were Christian, out of the total population of 1.5 million.[35] In 2011 The Christian population of Gaza Strip was less than 1,400. Attacks on Christians and their property are rare,[36] with the notable exception of those on The Teacher's Bookshop. A member of the Catholic faith told The Guardian he was stopped by a Hamas official and told to remove a wooden crucifix he was wearing.[37]

The Islamization of Gaza has put increasing pressure on the tiny Christian minority.[38] Following the Hamas takeover of Gaza in 2007, Abu Saqer, leader of Jihadia Salafiya, a rival group to Hamas,[39] announced the opening of a "military wing" to enforce Muslim law in Gaza. "I expect our Christian neighbors to understand the new Hamas rule means real changes. They must be ready for Islamic rule if they want to live in peace in Gaza." [40] Sheik Saqer has asserted that there is "no need" for Christians in Gaza to maintain Christian institutions and demanded that Hamas "must work to impose an Islamic rule or it will lose the authority it has and the will of the people."[41]

In October 2007, Rami Khader Ayyad, owner of Gaza's only Christian bookstore, was abducted, beaten and murdered, after his bookstore was firebombed by an unidentified group attacking targets associated with Western influence. According to Ayyad's family and neighbors, he had regularly received anonymous death threats from people angered by his missionary work. Ismail Haniyeh, leader of Hamas in Gaza, condemned Ayyad's killing and said Hamas "would not allow anyone to sabotage Muslim-Christian relations." Hamas officials made visits to Christian community, and its spokesman promised to bring those responsible to justice. No group claimed responsibility for the murder.[35][42][43][44]

Ayyad's funeral was attended by 300 Muslims and Christians. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights stated "This ugly act has no support by any religious group here."[36]

In 2012, a public protest was organized by dozens of Christians who claimed that two Christians were forcibly converted to Islam and were being held against their will. According to two mediators, the two Christians embraced Islam of their own free will. The conversions have the minority Christian population worried, and Huda Al-Amash, the mother of one of the converts, Ramez, stated, "If things remain like this, there'll be no Christians left in Gaza." Gaza's Archbishop Alexious said that the converts should be returned to their families.[45][46]
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 11:52 am

ray
Yes, but so what. Christians women would have to have 25 babies each to have a majority in Israel in this century. If you are talking about emigration, Israel is no different than Canada. If Canada had an influx of 40 million people of a different ethnic group I'm sure your government would react too

But all the Palestinians in occupied Palestine would have to do, is stay where they are and keep having babies. If they are born in what Israelis consider Israel would they be granted citizenship,? Would long term resident Arabs be able to become citizens? The probelm with annexing the West bank ... is the demographic time bomb or the need to make Arabs living there second class non-citizrns for eternity. Surely that doesn't reflect the morals of a modern state that guarantees freedoms and liberties equally to all citizens.

ray
[quotei]f you consider ethnic cleansing, forced name changes, relocation programs, and language repression as "protection" then Ricky is correct[/quote].
okay, you win. It wasn't what should be called call "protected". Then again only Baathists were really protected in saddamms Iraq... And compared to what came after Saddam, the 80's were "good times".

I notice you quotedthe expulsion of 2,000 Christians as particualrly heinous.
How many Palestinians have been expellled from "security zones" or had their houses bull dozed in the West Bank or Gaza? And what of he Prawner plan to relocate 40,000 Bedouin that Israel was forced to halt only because of International outrage?
Security fences that bisect travel routes and often seperate landowners homes from their land .... is a pretty common experience for people in the West bank.
I guess my point is, Ray...you keep insisting the Israelis are taking the "high road". I dn't think there is a high road being taken by anyone on that region.


Ho
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 20 Aug 2014, 12:44 pm

Ricky:
The probelm with annexing the West bank ...


That's why no one on these pages is advocating the annexation of the West Bank.

Ricky:
I guess my point is, Ray...you keep insisting the Israelis are taking the "high road".


Where have I insisted that? I've just said that they treat Christians better than others in the surrounding area, and that their actions in Gaza have been comparable to those of other western powers in similar conflicts (Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen). Most of what you write is arguing against things that I haven't said; have you noticed that?

Ricky:
I notice you quotedthe expulsion of 2,000 Christians as particualrly heinous.


No I didn't. I quoted a long passage on Wikipedia to show that your argument that Iraqi Christians were protected and thriving before 2003 is bull.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3741
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 21 Aug 2014, 9:29 am

Senior Hamas official admits Hamas involvement in killing of three Israeli teen-agers that led to war in Ghaza.http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5697372
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 21 Aug 2014, 10:53 am

freeman3 wrote:Senior Hamas official admits Hamas involvement in killing of three Israeli teen-agers that led to war in Ghaza.http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5697372


That seems very important to me. This is what the Israelis claimed very early in the conflict and there were many media reports that said that the Israelis made it up as a pretext for war.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 22 Aug 2014, 12:37 am

I don't recall such media reports. Perhaps you can link or cite a few, RJ?

I do recall that there were challenges to the idea that Hamas itself organised the kidnappings, on the basis that there was little evidence - but that is not the same thing. Hamas denied it, of course, and I guess they and other Palestinians may have made such allegations, but "media reports said" seems to imply that this was presented as fact, and not just one side's denials.

The official Israeli reason was Hamas rocket attacks and tunnels. Hamas may well have increased those rocket attacks in reaction to events surrounding the murders, and it was clearly one cause, but not the direct one.

Other things happened in the wake of the killing of those three lads. Firstly a series of raids in the West Bsnk that increased tension as they appeared to be heavy handed snd unfocused. Secondly the revenge killing of Arab boys. Do you consider those could also have had some contributory effect?
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3741
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 22 Aug 2014, 2:01 am

I am still not really sure if this was really planned by Hamas as an organization. It it clear that this was a Hamas cell but looking at other sources it appears that this cell may have acted on their own initiative. I am just not sure of what this Hamas official is saying, whether they are ratifying what this cell did or whether they are saying that operation was ordered to be carried out by senior Hamas members.
I do agree with RJ that Israel had been accused by some of using the murders as a pretext for the Gaza war. I don't see any articles from the mainstream press making that accusation but certainly some liberal groups have done so. I think whether this operation was ordered by higher-level Hamas officials is a significant one. Upon reflection, I just don't know that the statement from the Hamas official resolves the issue.
Last edited by freeman3 on 22 Aug 2014, 8:05 am, edited 1 time in total.