Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 19 Mar 2015, 3:51 pm

Ray Jay wrote:As to your 2nd paragraph, I don't agree. You suggest you know his conspiratorial intent. However, you also have to take into account that Netanyahu is partially responding (and groking the electorate's reaction) to the events on the ground in the region, including the brutality of Syria, Hamas, ISIS, U.S. softening vis-à-vis Iran, Hezbollah, a unity government between Hamas and the PA, etc.
Sorry, but it has been pretty much Likud policy for 30 years or so to expand settlements. The 1999 Charter is pretty unambiguous, and while the 2014 version is not quite as strong. It's not 'conspiracy' when it's pretty much the expressed policy.
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7463
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 19 Mar 2015, 5:26 pm

Shall we compare that with the Charter of Hamas? How does Hamas feel about Israel?
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 19 Mar 2015, 5:33 pm

danivon wrote:
Ray Jay wrote:Amen. I think we are done ... I was partially joking when I called him anti-Semitic ... but really, are we saying that all Jewish delis have an established view on he middle east and will throw you out if you disagree? But mostly I was joking.
Do you really think such accusations are a joking matter? Mind you, looks like ricky was joking too, but frankly it all falls flat after all the above and without any emoticons or indications of levity.
ok. But I think at that point Ricky and I had made up and our tones were mirroring each other. But ok, here are two emoti for you. :rolleyes: :wink:

I've learned that there is a wide variety of anti-zionisms. I've quoted some from Wikipedia and they are a disease. But that's not Ricky.
All of them?
I quoted about 15 paragraphs from Wikipedia. Much of that is sick. I read stuff like that every day in the comment section of Al Jazeera.

I'm not sure I believe in an absolute right to return for all Jews to Israel (or for anyone to any ancestral homeland).
ok, you don't have to. You aren't a Zionist. Ricky said he does. I do too.

I certainly disagree with the expansion of settlements in the occupied areas of Palestine.
I don't think that defines you as an anti-Zionist, but Ricky does because he has quoted Wikipedia. :grin: .

And I have reservations about founding a state based on ethno-religious grounds in an area where until recently that ethno-religious group was a minority (it's troubling enough in a majority).
Ricky seems ok with it. I'm more than ok with it.

Before the 1940s, Zionism and the opposition to it were about a potential future. Since then it is about a real present and past. We can't turn back the clock and undo the harms of the past. And so the Anti-Zionism that is about dismantling Israel is dangerous because that would cause more bloodshed.
100% agree. Not only is it dangerous; it is pervasive.

But there has to be a way to describe opposition to the expansionism or separatist policies of prominent Israeli politicians and sometimes the government itself. And critics of the way that the Zionist project is being carried out, particularly by Likud and as envisioned by Yisrael Beitenyu or Jewish Home do need to be able to be heard.


That's the point I've been trying to make for 2 pages, so thanks for clarifying it. Ricky is calling that anti-Zionism. However, those sorts of reasonable views are very different than the 15 paragraphs that I quoted where Zionists are responsible for the Holocaust, distracting you all with soccer, swimming, bullfighting, tennis, spreading Hep C and HIV, the French and Russian Revolutions, both world wars, colonialism, Darfur. I spent a day walking around in Mexico City and every newsstand sells copies of the Protocols. (You should have seen my cab driver's expression when I told him I was Jewish, or at least I think that's what I said, but my Spanish is rusty so perhaps I said I am a walrus; must be judging by his look. Wait ... :smile: )

These are 2 very different things: opposition to settlements and blaming Jews for HIV. I don't like them both being called anti-Zionism.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 20 Mar 2015, 6:49 am

danivon
And I have reservations about founding a state based on ethno-religious grounds in an area where until recently that ethno-religious group was a minority (it's troubling enough in a majority).

ray
Ricky seems ok with it. I'm more than ok with it.

In its current form, a nation occupying another, the notion of Israel as a Jewish state is very troubling. Especially because its quite clear that Israelis Arabs are systemically discriminated against in Israel proper. And because Palestinians in the West Bank are second class citizens with few rights.
If the West Bank was an independent nation, Palestine, as originally intended, the notion of a Jewish State would be acceptable.
Israel attempts to be both a pluralistic. democratic nation with guaranteed rights for all citizens and a "Jewish" nation. It is a contradiction.
A Palestinian state side by side with Israel would offer a balance, and an option for Arabs in the area. However, it is still clear that being an Arab (Muslim or Christian) in Israel when the nation is defined as a "Jewish State" is difficult. You might never feel like a genuine member of the nation.

Today, the "Right of Return" is really just an immigration policy that provides Jews with preferential treatment . In a pluralistic society where the minority population is growing much faster than the majority population that is supposed to define the national character of the nation - attracting Jewish immigration is pretty important. As long as the Right of return doesn't include a return to occupied territories or "settlements in the West bank" it shouldn't trouble anyone. What should trouble people is the Israelis "invitations" (by Netanyahu) to European Jews that rely upon fear to attract that immigration.
http://news.yahoo.com/netanyahu-urges-j ... 12753.html

Basically the man is claiming that intolerance is a problem with no solution, anywhere. And he's promoting the creation of a world of nations based only on race or religion. He's very big on dividing people and putting them behind barriers.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 20 Mar 2015, 2:22 pm

bbauska wrote:Shall we compare that with the Charter of Hamas? How does Hamas feel about Israel?
Do what you like. I'm not saying anything about what Hamas do or don't want. This is about what Likud have put forward as their platform.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 20 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm

Ray Jay wrote:These are 2 very different things: opposition to settlements and blaming Jews for HIV. I don't like them both being called anti-Zionism.
Well, we could call the one that it antisemitic "Anti-Semitism" to differentiate?

:confused:
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3741
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 21 Mar 2015, 12:55 pm

A couple of articles below by Daniel Estrin about the elections in Israel and Israel's political landscape. I found them to be informative and insightful but of course you may have a different judgment.

http://www.usnews.com/news/world/articl ... on-economy
http://www.usnews.com/news/world/articl ... lity-check
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 22 Mar 2015, 4:31 am

freeman3 wrote:A couple of articles below by Daniel Estrin about the elections in Israel and Israel's political landscape. I found them to be informative and insightful but of course you may have a different judgment.

http://www.usnews.com/news/world/articl ... on-economy
http://www.usnews.com/news/world/articl ... lity-check

Both quite short, but very interesting. Clearly Netanyahu is appealing to a nationalist tendency, and is using the 'enemy within' tactic more and more - that enemy being both the Israeli Arabs (who finally got their vote out and for a United slate) and the "Left" - although Labor and their allies in the ZU are not really that left wing.

It worked for this election, as it seems to have in the past, but Israeli society seems to be divided, which is not good, longer term.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 22 Mar 2015, 7:32 am

danivon wrote:
Ray Jay wrote:These are 2 very different things: opposition to settlements and blaming Jews for HIV. I don't like them both being called anti-Zionism.
Well, we could call the one that it antisemitic "Anti-Semitism" to differentiate?

:confused:


Yeah, I used the wrong word. If you bother to read the Wikipedia page that I cited, you will see that Zionists are blamed for AIDS, Ebola, the French and Russian Revolution, distracting the masses with soccer, etc. I'm differentiating between anti-Zionism (as in being against Israeli settlements on the West Bank) and anti-Zionism (as thinking that Zionists are the reason that some things suck).
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 22 Mar 2015, 7:35 am

Ricky:
Especially because its quite clear that Israelis Arabs are systemically discriminated against in Israel proper.


That again? Can you source that systematic discrimination?
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 22 Mar 2015, 7:42 am

Ricky:
What should trouble people is the Israelis "invitations" (by Netanyahu) to European Jews that rely upon fear to attract that immigration.
http://news.yahoo.com/netanyahu-urges-j ... 12753.html

Basically the man is claiming that intolerance is a problem with no solution, anywhere. And he's promoting the creation of a world of nations based only on race or religion. He's very big on dividing people and putting them behind barriers.


Such anger. I would think you would reserve your anger for the guys in Europe killing Jews in synagogues, schools, the streets, and kosher delis. (That could have been you enjoying a nosh :razz: ) Jews in France are taking down mezuzahs from the front of their homes. They are taking yarmulkes off their heads, and they are putting necklaces with Jewish symbols inside their shirts. Yes, Netanyahu is incredibly annoying trying to exploit the situation. But let's reserve our anger for the people creating this situation.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 22 Mar 2015, 8:11 am

ray
That again? Can you source that systematic discrimination?


The OR Commission?
The commission found deeply rooted factors leading up to clashes, including the structural and systematic discrimination suffered by Arab citizens. The commission stated unequivocally that: “the state did not do enough to grant equality to its Arab citizens and to eliminate discrimination and deprivation.” The commission strongly recommended that “a principle objective of the government must be the achievement of genuine equality for the Arab citizens of the state.” It even said, specifically, that there should be a redistribution of existing resources and that the matter required the prime minister’s personal involvement.


http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.550152
A 2009 study from the Hebrew University's School of Education demonstrated that the Israeli Education Ministry's budget for special assistance to students from low socioeconomic backgrounds "severely" discriminated against Arabs. The study found that because there were more needy Arab students, but fewer Arab students overall, educationally needy Jewish students receive anywhere from 3.8 to 6.9 times as much funding as equally needy Arab students. The Education Ministry said in response to the report that a decision has already been made to abandon this allocation method.[39] The Follow-Up Committee for Arab Education notes that the Israeli government spends an average of $192 per year on each Arab student compared to $1,100 per Jewish student. The drop-out rate for Arab citizens of Israel is twice as high as that of their Jewish counterparts (12 percent versus 6 percent). The same group also notes that there is a 5,000-classroom shortage in the Arab sector.[

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_Israel

And the Inequality report....

http://www.adalah.org/uploads/oldfiles/ ... h_2011.pdf
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 22 Mar 2015, 8:13 am

Ray
Yes, Netanyahu is incredibly annoying trying to exploit the situation
.
well, we agree that the's exploiting the situation.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 16006
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 22 Mar 2015, 9:17 am

rickyp wrote:Ray
Yes, Netanyahu is incredibly annoying trying to exploit the situation
.
well, we agree that the's exploiting the situation.
And so do prominent some French Jews:

http://www.jta.org/2015/02/20/news-opin ... -netanyahu

At a news conference Thursday in New York following a speech at Manhattan’s Park East Synagogue, Korsia said there had been a Jewish presence in France for 2,000 years and, echoing recent comments by French Prime Minister Manuel Valls, said that “France will no longer be France” if there were a mass Jewish exodus.

“His job is to say that,” Korsia said of Netanyahu. “It’s his nation. But our intention is to give a real choice to French and Jewish people. For a real choice, there has to be security and serenity in France.”


What concerns me about the way that Netanyahu jumped on the Paris tragedies to encourage Aliyah is that it also helps to "other" European Jews, adding to the suggestions that Jews belong elsewhere. It may even encourage more antisemitism on the basis that if more Jews become fearful they will leave.

Yes, the direct problem is antisemitism. But exploiting it for political gain is hardly going to help.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 22 Mar 2015, 9:56 am

rickyp wrote:ray
That again? Can you source that systematic discrimination?


The OR Commission?
The commission found deeply rooted factors leading up to clashes, including the structural and systematic discrimination suffered by Arab citizens. The commission stated unequivocally that: “the state did not do enough to grant equality to its Arab citizens and to eliminate discrimination and deprivation.” The commission strongly recommended that “a principle objective of the government must be the achievement of genuine equality for the Arab citizens of the state.” It even said, specifically, that there should be a redistribution of existing resources and that the matter required the prime minister’s personal involvement.


http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.550152
A 2009 study from the Hebrew University's School of Education demonstrated that the Israeli Education Ministry's budget for special assistance to students from low socioeconomic backgrounds "severely" discriminated against Arabs. The study found that because there were more needy Arab students, but fewer Arab students overall, educationally needy Jewish students receive anywhere from 3.8 to 6.9 times as much funding as equally needy Arab students. The Education Ministry said in response to the report that a decision has already been made to abandon this allocation method.[39] The Follow-Up Committee for Arab Education notes that the Israeli government spends an average of $192 per year on each Arab student compared to $1,100 per Jewish student. The drop-out rate for Arab citizens of Israel is twice as high as that of their Jewish counterparts (12 percent versus 6 percent). The same group also notes that there is a 5,000-classroom shortage in the Arab sector.[

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_Israel

And the Inequality report....

http://www.adalah.org/uploads/oldfiles/ ... h_2011.pdf


Yes, I posted too soon. But my point is that this is the sort of things that exists throughout the western world. Aboriginal Canadians where you are, Pakistanis in the UK, African-Americans in the US all face these sorts of challenges. I'm sure these studies can be debated and no doubt Israel could do better, and also worse. But that doesn't mean that the Right of Return for Jews to Israel should be invalidated. It doesn't mean that Israel cannot be both Jewish and Democratic. It just means that Israel can improve its policies.