Doctor Fate wrote:danivon wrote:Doctor Fate wrote:I have no idea, although I don't think he was dishonest--as you seem to. The odds are probably about 10-1 that he wins the district (inow, he's heavily favored).
the odds that a monkey in a beenie hat would win the District as the Republican candidate must be not much worse. It is the safest Republican district in Va. Brat didn't change that either way, so appealing to that is irrelevant.
Yeah, what a stooge! I mean nearly everyone has a PhD in economics, right? I mean, he probably went to some backwater, white bread, right-wing, low-standard school for his doctorate, right?
I never said he was a stooge. Quit twisting my words.
I'm well aware he's a PhD, and is well respected (which is why I find it odd that he can't express an opinion on the federal minimum wage, remember?). I was making a point about the
seat, not about the candidate.
Cantor would win it hands down. Brat would win it hands down. Anyone standing for the Republicans would win it hands down (from an economics professor to a meathead). It was not saying that he is anything less than he is, it's that the Republicans could put up who they like (just as the Democrats could in some of their safe seats).
Your point was that Brat is fine because he will win, as if that disproves what he actually said when asked clear direct questions in an interview. My rejoinder is that the safeness of the seat means however good he is will be outweighed by the sheer volume of in-the-bag Republican votes in the district.
So that he will win does not prove he was not being disingenuous when asked straightforward questions.
I guess no one who ever says anything dumb should ever run for office.
It wasn't "dumb", it was evasive. And he can run, He can even have office. I can have an opinion on him and express it.
So, you'll be all in against Hillary then?
I can think of better Democrat candidates (from my point of view), but no better Republican ones. I will probably be hoping for a miracle for whoever stands on the SPUSA ticket, and then that the lesser of the two big evils actually wins. I won't be particularly enthusiastic for Hillary or against her.
But you have the false memory that I was all agog for Obama. And still am. Not agreeing with you that he's the root of all problems in the USA is not quite the same thing as being a devotee.