-
- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8015
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
14 Jan 2011, 10:31 am
Initially posted at old site in December:
Before I forget, some thoughts on the league.
1) FAAB system. One year trial is complete and we will default to the old system unless a new amendment is passed.
2) IR. I wouldn't mind seeing one IR position. It gives you a place to put an injured keeper without burning an active spot.
Any other big (or small) issues out there?
-
- Uhtar the Terrible
- Statesman
-
- Posts: 708
- Joined: 17 Oct 2000, 12:18 pm
16 Jan 2011, 7:25 pm
1) I am for the for the FAAB system because it is different. I think it hurts more keen managers, which is me, but whatever. Still fun.
2) We already have 14 teams (which is great) and 16 roster spots which leaves not a lot of players. I think it is hard enough to improve your team if you start out poorly so I think I would vote no on that one.
-
- Sharur
- Dignitary
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am
17 Jan 2011, 11:13 pm
I liked FAAB. Wouldn't mind seeing it in the RBL, though I also think the system there works well enough.
I think the benches are deep enough to support injured players as is.
-
- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8015
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
30 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm
Bump.
Time to start seriously thinking about changes you would like to see in the league.
-
- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8015
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
27 May 2011, 12:25 pm
Something we did in the RBL that's worth consideration here (if we go back to the old waiver system):
-Players acquired via waiver maintain their base values.
-FA's always reset to zero (including original owners).
-Limited & keeper restricted acquisitions during playoffs.
-
- Sharur
- Dignitary
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am
28 May 2011, 1:06 pm
I still say keep FAAB. I know Barry's against it and Greg's for it, but beyond that I don't know where league sentiment is.
-
- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8015
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
01 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Looking for an owner to replace Pete. Redscape member preferred - I've advertised in the general forums - but can go outside if needed. As soon as we have a full ownership, I'll send out the amendments for voting.
Note - Tony's not confirmed but 99% positive he's in. I'll see him this weekend.
-
- Sharur
- Dignitary
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am
01 Jun 2011, 1:35 pm
I'll put in my official vote for FAAB here. I think it's both significantly more fair and far more strategically interesting than waivers.
-
- z06man
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 01 Jun 2011, 10:39 pm
01 Jun 2011, 10:41 pm
I think we should vote on the IR amendment as well. I think it should be a true IR slot though. Once a guy goes in, he stays until next season or you cut him.
-
- Sharur
- Dignitary
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am
02 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm
z06man wrote:I think we should vote on the IR amendment as well. I think it should be a true IR slot though. Once a guy goes in, he stays until next season or you cut him.
I'd be more favorably inclined toward this then a baseball DL-style IR spot.
-
- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8015
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
02 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm
I like the idea of limiting the IR slot to a single use (no changing your mind once you've used it). Should the amendment only allow for one such slot?
-
- z06man
- Adjutant
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 01 Jun 2011, 10:39 pm
03 Jun 2011, 12:48 am
I think if you are willing to drop the player in IR, you should be able to reuse it.
-
- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8015
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
03 Jun 2011, 6:14 am
Maybe I'm confused on what you mean. Could you write down what the rule would look like - that might clarify it in my mind.
-
- Sharur
- Dignitary
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am
03 Jun 2011, 6:34 pm
The idea is that you cannot move a player who is on IR back onto your active roster, he must either remain on the IR or be released.
-
- SLOTerp
- F1 Driver (Pro VI)
-
- Posts: 8015
- Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am
03 Jun 2011, 6:51 pm
Got it.