a solo should not even be possible. The game is set so you have a coalition win and that is how the players need to approach the game, by allowing something different now throws the game balance out the window. I think it was a WW4 game where we have similar 3 person wins, a player decided to instead go for a solo (before that was made impossible) and it screwed up that game badly. Everyone played one way, he played another and it was a mess, plenty of hard feeling all around. The game was designed to give everyone a fair shot at a win and to allow for more than one out of so many possible made it more exciting to actually have a real shot through politics. To allow a solo in this game is a really bad idea!
As far as it being broken, uhhhh
no it's not broken at all. If you base your feelings on the past two games then yes it would be broken no doubt but those games had different rules that upset the balance and were played with fewer players than designed. If you alter the game then the alteration is broken, not the base game. The standard game plays out quite well and most certainly is not broken and history bears this out.
As far as it being broken, uhhhh
no it's not broken at all. If you base your feelings on the past two games then yes it would be broken no doubt but those games had different rules that upset the balance and were played with fewer players than designed. If you alter the game then the alteration is broken, not the base game. The standard game plays out quite well and most certainly is not broken and history bears this out.